Stowers Institute Only Has Itself to Blame as MO House Restricts State Funding of Life Sciences
When the Stowers Institute Crowd financed and passed Amendment 2, it not only created a constitutional right to do human cloning research in Missouri, but as I pointed out during the campaign, it added a superfluous provision stating that if one kind of stem cell research received state support, other kinds could not be discriminated against. The purpose was--as we warned and the pro A. 2 debaters denied--to set the stage for state funding of Stowers and other efforts in the fields of ESCR and human cloning.
The ploy expected legislators to fund unethical research so that ethical research could also be funded. But that tactic has blown up in its face. The Missouri Legislature funds life sciences, but carefully restricts its scope so as to not put taxpayer money into areas that would also require cloning or ESC research to be funded. From HB 7, section 7.020, which just passed the MO House by a whopping 114-37 vote:
No later than December 31, 2009, the Life Sciences Research Board shall submit to the Chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee and the Chairman of the House Budget Committee an annual report containing, at a minimum: a description of each grant awarded... These funds shall be used exclusively on projects in the fields of animal science, plant science, medical devices, biomaterials and composite research, diagnostics, nanotechnology related to drug development and delivery, clinical imaging, or information technology related to human health.A court recently validated this approach against lawsuits claiming somehow that the state has to fund ESCR. Meanwhile, the Stowers Crowd continues to whine that it can't get researchers to move to MO to conduct unethical research because of these unfair restrictions. From the story:
"Expansion [of the Stowers Institute] probably now is more threatened by economic realities than it is by political realities. The economics of building a $300 million building are much different today."Stowers literally has billions, and it can fund whatever research it pleases. Its threats of funding restrictions to these researchers unless they move to Stowers, thus, must be seen as being about bully politics, not financial inability.
"Political realities" translate to the parts of Missouri where much stem cell research is opposed. Although Stowers, founder of American Century Investments, heavily supported a successful 2006 referendum to amend the state constitution to protect certain forms of stem cell research [Me: actually SCNT cloning research, but the Star is the most biased newspaper in the country when reporting on this issue], some Missouri lawmakers vowed to continue fighting against that research.
[William] Neaves said that had made it difficult to recruit top scientists, but now the institute is encouraging a pair of prominent stem cell researchers in Massachusetts--who had funding from the Stowers--to bring their labs to Kansas City. That funding is set to expire next year and will not be renewed. Both Kevin Eggan and Chad Cowan are considering whether to establish research programs at the Kansas City institute, Neaves said.
This is the power of non cooperation. Its message is clarion. Good for the legislators of MO for not buckling.
Labels: ESCR. Human Cloning Research. Amendment 2. Missouri. Funding of Life Sciences.
posted by Wesley J. Smith @ 9:16 AM
2 Comments
2 Comments:
but the Star is the most biased newspaper in the country when reporting on this issueand you Wesley are one of the most biased bloggers when it comes to reporting the issue - at least the Star has its facts in order.
The ploy expected legislators to fund unethical research so that ethical research could also be funded. whaaa? lets talk the real reasons shall we.
First - to dig up an old bone - is the reason for Amendment 2.
Stowers is a basic biomedical research facility that brings the brightest scientists it can find in the world to Missouri to conduct research.
For 6 years in a row 2, ultra right wing conservative lawmakers named Lembke and Bartle introduced legislation into the Missouri Congress that would make criminals of research scientists doing ESCr.
That hostility from prolife legislators was the primary cause of A2. Its a simple fact, so Don't be a revisionist.
2nd - You call it bullying for a research institute to attempt to actively recruit top scientists to its campus? Stowers is not Howard Hughes, the have a central location in Missouri, and I would expect like most work places they want their employees to work onsite in the lab. Your slander of Stowers recruiting efforts is misaligned.
3rd The purpose was--as we warned and the pro A. 2 debaters denied--to set the stage for state funding of Stowers and other efforts in the fields of ESCR and human cloning.Wrong again!
You should know better, reread A2.
"2. To ensure that Missouri patients have access to stem cell therapies and cures, that Missouri researchers can conduct stem cell research in the state, and that all such research is conducted safely and ethically, any stem cell research permitted under federal law may be conducted in Missouri, and any stem cell therapies and cures permitted under federal law may be provided to patients in Missouri, subject to the requirements of federal law"
A2 - passed by the people of Missouri says:
(1) No person may clone or attempt to clone a human being.
Which Stowers never intends to do.
The majority of people agree that a pre-implantation blastocyst is not a human being. Sorry this fact is so hard for you to accept but if you cant be honest with the reality of the definition, even if you disagree with it then you'll never be able to discuss this issue with any credibility.
"that basically these 'funding' attacks are really a Trojan horse to ban stem cell research."
Furthermore your point seems to be that Stowers shot itself in the foot by forcing the state to remove human research from its budget, and then go on to say they have billions of dollars to fund whatever they want.That does not correlate. Besides , now that Federal Funding is thankfully on the table for real, the flow of money in to human stem cell research is much more lucrative.
Basic stem cell research is ethical and imperative.
"The majority of people agree that a pre-implantation blastocyst is not a human being."
Still using this ploy as a way to skirt the scientific realities? Did you catch Wesley's post in which he demonstrated why human embryos are rightly referred to as human beings?
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home