WJS: Skunk at the Earth Day Party
As usual, I find myself the skunk at the party. As the world celebrates Earth Day, that term has become a bit ominous. Environmentalism is devolving into an increasingly anti-human movement that could end up costing the human race dearly. I have a piece on the matter in today's NRO called "Homo Sapiens, Get Lost." Here are a few excerpts:
Over the last few hundred years in the West, the moral foundations of society were profoundly pro-human. Judeo-Christian moral philosophy and secular humanism both promoted human flourishing and the protection of individual rights as primary purposes of society. But in recent years we have witnessed a rebellion against "human exceptionalism"--the view that ultimate moral value comes with being a member of the human species...Here and abroad, environmentalism itself seems to be evolving from a movement dedicated to conserving resources, preserving pristine areas, and protecting endangered species into an anti-humanistic ideology that increasingly disdains humankind as a scourge that literally threatens the existence of "the planet."I point out that this "subversion' of a healthy environmentalism was "conceived and gestated" in the Deep Ecology Movement. I then briefly describe Deep Ecology's ideology, its desire to reduce our population to under a billion, and its profound anti-humanism, with quotes about humans as the AIDS virus:
It is tempting to roll one's eyes and dismiss Deep Ecology’s anti-humanism as merely the kook fringe being the kook fringe. Alas, as in a Michael Crichton novel, the values of Deep Ecology have escaped the hothouse where they were expected to remain confined and invaded the popular culture, to the point where Hollywood has promoted the movement's anti-human beliefs in major motion pictures.I discuss the remake of The Day the Earth Stood Still, in which the alien is not sent here, as in the original to save humankind from itself, but to obliterate us to "save the planet":
At the last possible moment, Klaatu prevents the holocaust, but as he departs for home, his space sphere emits a pulse causing all machinery and electricity on earth to cease functioning--the clear implication being that in order to co-exist peacefully with the planet, humans must become utterly non-technological. Unmentioned in this happy ending is that such a sudden collapse in technology would result in billions of human deaths from starvation and disease.Earth is not the only anti-human A-List Hollywood movie released recently:
In The Happening, starring Mark Wahlberg, filmmaker and writer M. Night Shyamalan, best known for the supernatural thriller The Sixth Sense, offers an apocalyptic tale of a rebellion against the oppressive human hegemony--by plants.These are just movies, one might say. But our motion pictures often depict the values, if not of the general population, then certainly of the liberal elite who control the power institutions of our society.
In the Flora Rebellion, plants release "pheromones" that cause human beings to commit mass suicide. Shyamalan depicts this catastrophe as it unfolds through the eyes of Wahlberg's character, his wife, and the small daughter of a friend--protagonists who get steadily pushed into ever tighter corners as the mass-suicide epidemic spreads through the Northeast. At one point, they take refuge in a model home in a new housing development. Realizing that the pheromones are released when a critical mass of human beings is present, they flee as a larger group of refugees approach. As the members of the larger group begin to kill themselves en masse, Wahlberg's nuclear family runs past a huge advertising sign for the housing development that carries the unsubtle message of the film, "Because you deserve it."
Radical environmentalism that rejects human exceptionalism won't save the planet, but it could cause a great deal of harm to humankind. It is being force fed to your children, in part, by the movies coming soon to a theater near you.


18 Comments:
Dear Mr. Smith - I found your article on the national review to be one of the poorest pieces of journalism I have ever read - I think you need a lesson in how to cut your windbag into a concise article and not utilize the internet to its extreme by barreling on endlessly without facts, figures or anything other than broad ridiculous statements. If Kaatu were here and stopped all technology, I would have the great satisfaction of knowing that you could never again write on the internet. Nobody is anti-human, but maybe we could be a little bit pro-earth. It is the only place we've got...
"Looking around, can we have any doubt of Huxley’s prescience?"
Mr. Smith,
Your right. By tediously reviewing two movies no one saw, you proved incontrovertibly that the lunatics of the Deep Ecology movement are taking over. After your ambitious, opening paragraph, your article could have used some evidence.
Your article is an orgy of straw men and no evidence. The real task of a journalist is to convince people who disagree with his positions.
Your friend,
iJeeves and Jonathan Ghitis: Thanks for stopping by. iJeeves: Own it.
Jonathan, my point was that these views are seeping into the popular culture, using A-List Hollywood as examples. Those are facts and that is evidence.
I think my next book may be about the anti-humanism of radical environmentalism. That will give me plenty of space to develop the theme.
Mr. Smith -
I think a great part of the internet is the fact that I don't need to own it - suffice to say I am a graduating senior at an ivy league institution who was greatly disappointed by your article. I am not a fringe kook, I am not post modern and I don't study sociology. I litter and exploit the environment and I don't recycle or calculate my carbon footprint...I am on your side, down with the environment.
But seriously, I agree with Mr. Ghitis and I have to say that your reference to A Brave New World, while starting your article with a bang, was left hanging. I wish you would have elaborated and substantiated with evidence how you truly believe that Huxley was prescient and that our current world in any way resembles his. I think you cannot and you were just going for shock value.
I'll keep reading, you keep writing
Sean
Mr. Smith,
My guess is that if you interviewed the people behind both movies, you would find that they were typical hollywood liberals, naive and ignorant in the Sean Penn vein. They probably are obsessed with Global Warming and were playing on that theme and promoting environmentalism. But the reality is that everyone involved with both movies almost certainly doesn't advocate depopulation schemes or agree with Deep Ecology. Implying that the two parties are in the same camp is a little bit disingenuous
iJeeves: Thanks for reading. But your original post didn't seem like constructive criticism as much as attack.
I agree that that the open is a good idea for an article. But I was asked to do something different.
I have mined that theme a bit and will some more.
Only 2 movies about mankind being warned about "Destroying The Planet"?
Ummm ... let's see: The Day After Tomorrow, An Inconvenient Truth, the two movies mentioned already, a bunch of commentary in Independence Day, The Thaw, The Quantum of Solace (BOND!!), WALL-e, Judge Dred, South Park.
TV is full of this garbage, too.
It's an never-ending drone of media agitprop designed to get into our subconscious so that we become as filled with the same groupthink trash that fills the minds of the rest of the leftist drones - like Obama - and let the "enlightened ones" step in and save us from living a decent life without their noble jackboots/flipflops on our necks.
That's just the movies
The Bear. Your point is well taken. But the two movies I mentioned are at the very top of the Hollywood food chain.
Inc. Truth was a life ring to Gore pushed primarily by the wife of Larry David. It was propaganda, but not Big Time Show Business. But I think it showed the power of the Cultural Left to control our discourse and to scare the heck out of our children.
It is going to get worse before it gets better.
Mr Smith
2 thoughts, both of which are trivial:
1) Thankfully, most of the movies cited are terribly unpopular. Which is not to say that you are wrong, but just that things might not be as bad as you suggest. Of course, most of those movies were terrible, and it may simply be the case that once the environmentalists make a good movie, you will turn out the be prophetic. But until that day, they are critical failures.
2) Mr. The Bear, I strongly object to your including Wall-e in your list of radical environmentalist movies. While it may start out seeming that way, in the end it is a beautiful movie about humanity needing to be saved from the orgy of technology that alienates us from one another. I know, its a small and silly thing to object to, but I think it was a fantastic movie.
.
Great piece, we must keep fighting and resisting this eco-insanity. Everyone should have all their friends and family read the excellent
Michael Crichton's "Environmentalism as Religion" speech.
save our planet
KILL all the humans
- HAPPY Earth Day
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
spread hysteria
wildly exaggerate
scare little kids not ready
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
have faith in junk science
destroying economies
may serve your world view
.
USpace.
All real freedom starts with freedom of speech. Without freedom of speech there can be no real freedom.
.
Philosophy of Liberty Cartoon.
Visit: HaltTerrorism.com.
Sean, where is your copy of Strunk and White? Isn't it sold at Ivy League bookstores?
Great piece, Wesley. Keep up the good work. If these guys can't see the anti-humanism around them, their heads are in the sand. And it's being fed to kids in school, too, with blatant propaganda about, inter alia, global warming.
Oh, and I'm rather proud to say that until I checked SHS I didn't even know today is Earth Day. :-)
I think that Earth always knows what day it is. But I don't think it knows about Earth Day. Thankfully.
I've long felt that many of the movies geared toward children have been unabashedly against human progress. Just a few of them being "Over the Hedge" which mocks and demonizes people for creating neighborhood developments, "Ice Age" which excoriates man for hunting animals, and "Happy Feet" which pushes the Global Warming hoax on children, feeding their increasing insecurity about their futures. I've quietly removed these DVDs from our library, replacing them with selections such as Veggie Tales movies and "Horton Hears a Who".
Have been following your Blog for quite some time now Mr. Smith. You have left ample proof on this blog, that your summation in your above article is well founded . Keep up the good work.
Wesley, thanks for the commentary on the remake of The Day the Earth Stood Still. That's one I'll be sure to miss.
About wiping out our technology, such an event would backfire on the aliens in the movie who claim to be trying to preserve Earth. Before the mass human die-off you mention, virtually every edible plant and wildlife would be consumed by hungry humans in a desperate attempt to stave off starvation. End result: few or no humans and and a denuded planet.
But such a realization requires the kind of deep thought that Hollywood screenplay writers often sorely lack.
iJeeves:
Wesley was bitching about the fact that our main stream media is overwhelmed with anti-human rhetoric. Which it is.
I personally disagree with his assessment of The Happening because, having read up a little on the background, it was less about "the world protecting itself from evil humans" and more about, "Humans are surrounded by an evil world we have to learn to survive." So I'll take up the argument against *that* one.
I also disagree with The Bear's listing of Wall-E. The director of Wall-E wanted to do a film about a guy who was so low on the totem pole nobody saw him as a hero, and who better than a janitor? The director himself said he had no political agenda, he just wanted to make this hero start out... not *pathetic* exactly, but so totally unlikely, wrapped up in his work, and yet able to give up his work for love.
It pays to watch movies with the commentary track on. Heh.
WARNING! THIS IS EXTREMELY GROSS! And yet, it's real, so I feel it necessary to bring up, in light of our deep ecology debate here.
LAST CHANCE TO AVOID SICKENING STUFF!
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/274805/suicide_sodomy_abortion_and_cannibalism.html
From the Church of Euthanasia! Sodomy, Suicide, Abortion and Cannibalism!
Apparently this cross-dresser person had contact with an alien being called THE BEING who wants us all to wipe ourselves out. Oddly, the people in charge of this church think that it's more important that they live to tell everyone else to die than it is for them to kill themselves. Go figure, huh?
Now for the really gross thing:
How to butcher a human carcass for human consumption!
http://www.churchofeuthanasia.org/e-sermons/butcher.html
I freakin' kid you NOT. I stumbled upon these people around the same time I found out about the monkey head transplants. There was some link about the monkeys on The Onion's website, and from there I found an article about the Church of Euthanasia. Weirded out and thinking that The Onion made it up, I was shocked that Yahoo.com gave me the above link.
Warning - don't read it on a full stomach. Or an empty stomach, for that matter. I got seriously weirded out by it.
THIS is the kind of thing that our deep ecology-minded friends are creating. We're in a world that's so warped in its values that there's a church out there endorsing killing other humans or ourselves for food, to prevent humans from becoming a burden on the earth.
For anyone who thinks that Wesley is going overboard in his concern about deep ecology, we're not talking about people who want to plant a few more trees or get some land dedicated for untouchable forest. I am all for that (after all, we need plenty of land for animals to be happy and healthy, and I love my animals. I also enjoy hunting, and deer need lots of room to be healthy, or else it's unhealthy to hunt them).
What we're talking about here is a growing group of people who don't think anything of killing off random humans for the sake of the planet. We're talking about some very sick people with some very sick agendas, and here we go, seeing these same agendas being spoon-fed to us in the media. It's disgusting.
So anybody who's complaining that Wesley is venting about The Day The Earth Stood Still, please keep in mind there are plenty of folks out there who would look at that as a sign that we should nuke our technology, let people die by the billions, and go back to living in caves until such time as we all perish.
I don't understand how that will save the earth. After all, under the deep ecology belief, the world needs to be without human interference, but if there's no human interference, then eventually the planet will die anyway, when the sun blows up. Whereas if humans continue to evolve and live on the planet, everything that makes up the earth (except for the ground) might be saved if we were to come up with a means of interstellar travel. Just as an example. But anyway, whatever we do, ultimately it doesn't matter. Either God fixes everything at the end times, or else the planet gets absorbed by our sun, one way or the other. So eh.
Deep ecology doesn't make much sense to me.
Neither does promoting cannibalism and abortion as a means to save the earth.....
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home