Upside Down Medicine in Oregon: Paying to Kill, but Not to Extend Life
Oregon's Health Services Commission has published the list of covered treatments under the state's rationed Medicaid law. Comfort care is high on the list, and includes assisted suicide. But the overseers of rationed care explicitly state that treatment to extend life if the prognosis for living five years is poor, will not be covered. From the Prioritized List, page SI-1:
Such is the compassion of the culture of death--and the future of all health care if the utilitarian health care rationers ever are put in charge.COMFORT/PALLIATIVE CARE It is the intent of the Commission that comfort/palliative care treatments for patients with an illness with <5%> expected five year survival be a covered service. Comfort/palliative care includesthe provision of services or items that give comfort to and/or relieve symptoms for such patients. There is no intent to limit comfort/palliative care services according to the expectedlength of life (e.g., six months) for such patients, except as specified by Oregon AdministrativeRules.
It is the intent of the Commission to not cover diagnostic or curative care for the primary illness or care focused on active treatment of the primary illness which are intended to prolong life or alter disease progression for patients with <5%> five year survival.
Examples of comfort/palliative care include:..
5) Services under ORS 127.800-127.897 (Oregon Death with Dignity Act), to include but not be limited to the attending physician visits, consulting physician confirmation, mental health evaluation and counseling, and prescription medications.


2 Comments:
they already ARE in charge.
This is horrifying.
For some reason the numbers by the flags have jumped markedly since yesterday. There is a great deal still to e done.
Boy does this call for bazookas. I'm talking theoretically of course; but might is exercised in all this legalized murder that's going on, and right is might, and has might behind it, and might sometimes has to be used to fight wrong. When animal rights activists use extreme measures, they are fighting violence against the vulnerable, helpless, innocence, and defenseless; I'm not advocating violence, but something more stringent than saying it's wrong has to be called into play to stop the madness that's going on and running rampant with, up to now, impunity.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home