Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Deep Ecology Misanthropy Moving Into Mainstream Environmentalism

Deep Ecology is a neo earth religion, the ideology of which holds that nature should be given equal consideration with people--a concept sometimes called ecological egalitarianism. The explicit rejection of human exceptionalism led adherents into a profound nihilism and anti-humanism in which deep ecologists yearn for a radical human depopulation to under 1 billion.

It is one thing when the fringe speaks in this manner. But as we have noted here at SHS before, such thinking is moving into the popular culture with movies such as The Day the Earth Stood Still, and also, closer to the environmental mainstream with its growing obsessions over climate change and limiting human prosperity. Now, a major UK environmental adviser wants to see his country cut its population in half. From the story:

JONATHON PORRITT, one of Gordon Brown's leading green advisers, is to warn that Britain must drastically reduce its population if it is to build a sustainable society.

Porritt's call will come at this week's annual conference of the Optimum Population Trust (OPT), of which he is patron. The trust will release research suggesting UK population must be cut to 30m if the country wants to feed itself sustainably. Porritt said: "Population growth, plus economic growth, is putting the world under terrible pressure"...

Porritt is winning scientific backing. Professor Chris Rapley, director of the Science Museum, will use the OPT conference, to be held at the Royal Statistical Society, to warn that population growth could help derail attempts to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Rapley, who formerly ran the British Antarctic Survey, said humanity was emitting the equivalent of 50 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere each year. "We have to cut this by 80%, and population growth is going to make that much harder," he said.
There are decidedly genocidal and tyrannically eugenic implications in such advocacy. Porritt, for example, has called for the UK to adopt a 2 child policy. But that would, at most, keep the population roughly static--assuming immigration was limited. It would not cut the population by half--the UK currently has about 61 million people--meaning much harsher measures would have to be taken than exerting social pressure or enacting legal requirements to restrict family size.

It is of great concern that a key adviser to the government seems to have swallowed the deep ecology poison and still be considered a respectable spokesperson for environmentalism.

Labels:

8 Comments:

At March 24, 2009 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm anxiously awaiting the day that having children is no longer seen as something people are free to do, and is switched to a "privilege". Mandatory genetic counseling and forced sterilization of the non-optimal, anyone?

Really, one wonder why these eco-experts worry about us wiping ourselves out through global catastrophe. We're doing a fine job with policy.

 
At March 24, 2009 , Blogger SAFEpres said...

Isn't this the man who also advocated increasing the abortion rate in pursuit of this goal? This man has got to be fired, and I don't even live in the UK!!! If he wants to see the pop cut in half, and supports dracion measures to accomplish this, than he better set a good example and go first.

 
At March 24, 2009 , Blogger RossHeckmann said...

The position that the human race should be cut to one billion, by God-knows-what means, is evil. It is also ridiculous. See

http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2009/03/headed-toward-e.html

The above blog entry is by Phillip Longman, a senior fellow at the New America Foundation and the author of "The Empty Cradle: How Falling Birthrates Threaten World Prosperity and What to Do about it."

 
At March 24, 2009 , Blogger Jason said...

I suppose it would be unreasonable to declare open season on anybody advocating this sort of thing in public ?

If the population should be reduced then they should do the right thing and off themselves. For those to hypocritical to do the right thing, public advocacy of this sort of rampant idiocy should mean forfeiting a few privileges like a right to breathe.

 
At March 24, 2009 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

RossHeckmann: Thanks for the tip and for stopping by SHS.

 
At March 24, 2009 , Blogger RossHeckmann said...

You're quite welcome. Thanks for SHS, which I forward fairly frequently, particularly to Democrats for Life groups for the whole U.S. ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Democrats-For-Life/ ) and for California ( http://lists.topica.com/lists/californiadfla/prefs/info.html ).

I actually got the tip about the article concerning falling birth rates from Right Democrat (rightdemocrat@aol.com) , who has a blog at http://rightdemocrat.blogspot.com/ and who frequently posts to the Blue Dog Moderate Democrats yahoo group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bluedogmoderatedemocrats/ . The blue dog yahoo group, Right Democrat, and myself are all much more oriented towards social traditionalism & economic populism than the Blue Dogs in Congress.

 
At March 25, 2009 , Blogger Unknown said...

We feel entitled to control the lives and populations of other animals, of course there's this now. As with vivisection, which assumes results might work in, and help, humans, first them, then us.

 
At March 28, 2009 , Blogger Joshua said...

It seems that environmentally, falling birth rates are great. Economically, falling birth rates are terrible.

What a surprise - the economy versus the environment, yet again.

Seeing as environmental collapse will destry the economy anyway, I know which one I would choose.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home