Charo Appointed to Obama Team as Patient's Own Adult Stem Cells Make New Windpipe
The new Obama Administration is going to push full speed ahead pouring money into ESCR--and I worry, human cloning research. This concern is heightened by the appointment of Alta Charo to the transition team. I know Alta, and we get along fine personally. But we clash. (She once called me a leader of the "endarkenment.") Charo, like so many academics, is very radical (from my perspective) on these and most other bioethical issues, and so--as I have said previously--we are entering very dark days. (I privately predicted Charo would head the Obama bioethics council--which will be a stacked deck without the protests in the bioethics industry and in the media about deck stacking that we saw with the Kass-led Council, even though it wasn't one. However, this early appointment might mean a high post in the Department of Health and Human Services.)
Meanwhile, ethical stem cell research continues to advance exponentially. Now, scientists grew a new windpipe for a woman from her own stem cells, and successfully transplanted it into her body. From the story:
Stopping human cloning in an Obama Administration may be difficult. But I think that the more stories like this come out, the more likely it will be for us to generate sufficient public opposition that maybe, just maybe, that agenda might stall.A 30-year-old Spanish woman has made medical history by becoming the first patient to receive a whole organ transplant grown using her own cells. Experts said the development opened a new era in surgery in which the repair of worn-out body parts would be carried out with personally customised replacements.
Claudia Castillo, who lives in Barcelona, underwent the operation to replace her windpipe after tuberculosis had left her with a collapsed lung and unable to breathe. The bioengineered organ was transplanted into her chest last June at the Hospital Clinic in Barcelona. Four months later she was able to climb two flights of stairs, go dancing and look after her children – activities that had been impossible before the surgery. Ms Castillo has also crossed a second medical frontier by becoming the first person to receive a whole organ transplant without the need for powerful immunosuppressant drugs.
Doctors overcame the problem of rejection by taking her own stem cells to grow the replacement organ, using a donor trachea (lower windpipe) to provide the mechanical framework. Blood tests have shown no sign of rejection months after the surgery was complete.


21 Comments:
Is this a real break through, or just another mundane non-embryonic stem cell success? It sounds like walking on water, turning water into wine. Next thing you know we'll see the lame to walk and the blind to see and it won't get proportionate attention in America because it's not embryonic stem cells doing the trick.
Success in the realm of adult stem cells will not be able to stall the embryonic stem cell research agenda during the next 8 years, because the issue is not about developing new treatments, but using government to establish in a definitive way that pre-natal human organisms are not human beings, so that health care will include unfettered access to abortions.
"I know Alta, and we get along fine personally. But we clash. (She once called me a leader of the 'endarkenment.')"
......yyyeah. That indicates to me that you do NOT get along personally. One does not say such things about someone she gets along with personally but disagrees with on an issue.
Leftists do. Leftists are ideologues. Wesley, on the other hand, is a gentleman.
Cloning does not hold the same hope that adult stem-cell research ohlds, because some differentiation helps to avoid the formation of tumors. People are just taught to believe in this blindly. What is most angering is the lack of care for the very patients the ESCR supporters claim to represent.
I also heard from a colleague that Charo was on the top of the list. This does worry me but it is not unexpected. Research goes where the money goes. Hopefully the money will not be in embryonic stem cells. I remember reading in the Wall Street Journal that Wall Street was not backing embryonic stem cell technologies because it wasn't financially feasible. I can only hope this will continue to be true. Madison researchers are also involved in adult stem cell research. Let's hope that this technology proves to be the most promising.
Yeay, Stem Cell Success, the future is now. Your opposition is dust. True dat.
It's sad, Dark Swan, that you so staunchly favor ideology over funding what's actually working.
And if opposition is "dust," why are you still here, exactly? We allegedly don't exist, right?
Adult/non-embryonic stem cell success. The adult/non embryonic stem cells are still pumping out successes. Still no embryonic ones after the billions poured in. But like the other failing entities, you'll get your bail out DS.
Oh, Don, but Dark Swan simply INSISTED that stem cell success is only something that can happen in the future, as in once Obama is in office! And, remember: this is the one who said that ESCR and ASCR aren't in competition against each other. Heh...
Funny how people will announce that a blog or group of people is now irrelevant -- and then keep coming back again and again to make the same point.
ahh but what I actually said was 'increasingly irrelevant', which by your own measure here - is true. - again BM is altering my statements to meet his/her own ends. Even smoldering ashes can start another fire and I just drank a 6 pack.
"you so staunchly favor ideology over funding what's actually working."
Ha thats a joke! Most people on this blog don't favor ESCr because its against their ideology. Not because they are sooo concerned about ESCr being successful or not!
Whether or not they can even admit that to themselves is not my problem.
I have stated time and again that support should be open and unfettered for all types of stem cell research. That is precisely the type of ethical research Obama will promote.
Killing human beings for their stem cells is not ethical. No one who would create their own clone and kill him or her, is ethical.
Dark Swan: "Even smoldering ashes can start another fire and I just drank a 6 pack."
This explains the majority of your posts.
"Most people on this blog don't favor ESCr because its against their ideology."
DS, EVERYTHING'S an ideology. Do you think we should drop an atomic bomb on Mexico City to see how well it works? No, because that goes against your ideology (and mine). The anti-ESCR ideology is that we shouldn't be destroying human beings for medical research and the pro-ESCR ideology is that we should.
"Not because they are sooo concerned about ESCr being successful or not!"
Ours is at least a two-faceted argument. When someone asks why ESCR shouldn't proceed, we respond with the explanation that we shouldn't be destroying human beings for medical research. When someone makes the false claim that ESCR is our only or best hope for treating/curing disease, that's when we bring out the results from clinical trials to refute THAT.
"I have stated time and again that support should be open and unfettered for all types of stem cell research. That is precisely the type of ethical research Obama will promote."
Is that why he voted against exploring ethical alternatives when he was in the Senate?
It is great news these adult stem cells.
I understand that embryonic stem cells have cured nothing so far while adult stem cells have cured many diseases and medical problems.
I wrote about it on my blog
http://secularheretic-st.blogspot.com/2008/11/transplant-using-trachea-grown-from.html
When someone makes the false claim that ESCR is our only or best hope for treating/curing disease
Who made this argument BM?
Lets discuss who's argument you're referencing, if you can.
dark swan: His handle is bmmg39. Please use that in the future so one does not think you are juvenile and engaging in scatological humor.
Jeezus are you serious? I know you play double standards for your preferred readers but this is ridiculous.
Well Wesley my handle is Dark Swan. You may be referring to me as someone with downs syndrome. So please refer to me with my full name so one does not think you are engaging in retardation humor. Whatever.
At March 28, 2008 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...
You are consistently inaccurate DS:
At June 05, 2008 , Blogger bmmg39 said...
Lay off the hash pipe before you post, DS.
At June 05, 2008 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...
bmmg39: DS was telling me I was going to burn in the hereafter. Time will tell.
At June 06, 2008 , Blogger bmmg39 said...
Wouldn't that be an example of DS forcing religion down everyone else's throat?
At June 06, 2008 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...
Un, gee: Thanks for the clarification on that DS.
At June 09, 2008 , Blogger bmmg39 said...
...In that case, DS, just lay off the hash, period.
At November 12, 2008 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...
DS: As usual, you mix apples and oranges,
At November 14, 2008 , Blogger bmmg39 said...
...Are you injecting religion into science again, DS?
Still bmmg39 still hasn't answered with a follow up. Who was making those arguments 39, or is it another of your strawman.
bmmg39: "When someone makes the false claim that ESCR is our only or best hope for treating/curing disease..."
Dark Swan:
"Who made this argument BM? Lets discuss who's argument you're referencing, if you can."
Oh, ONLY nearly every politician and mainstream media "reporter." Sen. Tom Harkin made the claim, as did Sen. Kennedy. While running for governor of New Jersey, Jon Corzine proclaimed that those who say that adult stem cells are working are "delusional." Brian Dickerson of the DETROIT FREE PRESS called adult stem cells a "red herring."
"Still bmmg39 still hasn't answered with a follow up."
Do you have a job, Dark Swan? I know I do...
When did Senator Kennedy say our only hope for curing/treating disease was embryonic stem cells?
When? Where?
Do you have a job, Dark Swan? I know I do...
You're the one making unsubstantiated claims, if you cant be bothered to support them, then don't waste our time making them.
Kennedy, as well as Harkin, held up that bogus letter to SCIENCE Magazine -- the one that claimed to debunk adult stem cell success when it merely pointed out that most ASC treatments weren't yet FDA-approved -- as "evidence" that ESCR is where our focus really should be.
bmmg39: "When someone makes the false claim that ESCR is our only or best hope for treating/curing disease..."
Dark Swan:
"Who made this argument ...?
bmmg39: Oh, ONLY nearly every politician ... Sen. Kennedy
...held up that bogus letter to SCIENCE Magazine
What exactly did Kennedy say when they held up this journal?
As far as I've seen he primarily spoke to releasing the federal ban for funding ESCr saying it was valuable research for the future, which most people agree with him on. Not this false clash of ASCr vs ESCr that you create then attempt to tear down.
At what point did Kennedy or Harkin say ESCr was our only hope for curing disease?
At what point did Senator Kennedy directly oppose ASCr in the way your type have schemed against ESCr?
Do you have any reference to back up your assertion?
I don't see where he says that ESCr is the only hope for the future at his site -
http://www.tedkennedy.com/journal/147/kennedy-op-ed-on-stem-cell-research
http://www.tedkennedy.com/journal/1410/can-congress-help-fulfill-the-promise-of-stem-cell-research
"Many distinguished pro-life public officials and leaders in the private sector understand that a policy blocking essential medical research has no place in a true culture of life. Embryos used as a source of lifesaving stem cells are produced in excess during in-vitro fertilization, and are currently being discarded or frozen, often for many years. Surely we value life more by using them to save lives than by discarding them.
Some respond to the failure of the current policy by saying we should explore new ways to develop embryonic stem cells. I agree. Let¹s explore the potential of new discoveries in genetics and cell science to improve the ways we can tap the potential of stem cells. But let¹s not restrict essential research while scientists explore speculative and preliminary theories.
Some say embryonic stem-cell research brings no guarantee of success. I agree – but not even to try does guarantee absolute failure. Perhaps stem-cell research will turn out not to cure Robert Klein¹s paralysis – but is it any less worthwhile if instead it cures a child of diabetes or rids a patient of Parkinson¹s disease?
Some say we should encourage research on stem cells from the blood in umbilical cords or on adult stem cells from bone marrow and other tissues.
Again, I agree. We should seek help for patients wherever it may be found."
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home