Wednesday, May 21, 2008

DNA Fingerprinting Identifies Viable IVF Embryos

By Jennifer Lahl

Has the era of high tech embryo profiling arrived? I have been following the recent study published in the journal Human Reproduction. Researchers have combined the technology that allows them to screen embryos at the blastocyst stage with the DNA fingerprinting and microarray analysis technology in order to identify the viable blastocysts transferred into the mother. The search for the best embryo has always been part of the IVF equation with all the quality controls put in place in the lab.

So how is the research being conducted?

“The researchers tested the DNA of early in vitro fertilization embryos before implanting them into the womb, and then compared the results with the DNA of the healthy babies that were born, and found a cluster of genes that could be used to establish which embryos are likely to make it to full term.”

And why is this research touted as progress?

“The idea is that by using objective, measurable criteria rather than the current more subjective observations such as looking at the morphology of the blastocysts, the ability to predict which embryos are viable will improve to such an extent that IVF clinicians will be able to confidently implant single embryos without reducing pregnancy rates.”

Current methods of embryo testing and embryo grading occur daily in IVF clinics and are just part of the routine. I’ve always criticized embryo grading for being subjective, harmful and dangerous to the early embryo as well as just not a good indicator of the future health of the baby. We’re in dangerous waters here.

The timeline keeps getting moved back further and further in human development in our insatiable quest for the perfect people. We’ve become a people with zero tolerance with anything less than perfect.

Labels: , ,

4 Comments:

At May 21, 2008 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

Thanks Jennifer. I was appalled to read in today's Telegraph that Brave New Britain's Parliament passed the human/animal embryo bill, as well as the savior sibling sanction. (Would love your take, particularly on the Tory leader's comment that he supported the hybrids to help his disabled child.)

Reproduction is definitely moving toward manufacture with product testing, quality control, and marketing.

I wonder if they'll soon come out with warranties and recalls! Also, tort lawsuits if a child doesn't meet parental expectations.

 
At May 21, 2008 , Blogger Jennifer Lahl said...

I'll be blogging on that in a bit. I'm experiencing some technological difficulties.

You're supposed to be on vacation ;-)

 
At May 21, 2008 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with Wesley that this all smells of "increased methods for building our own children"... another step in parental control over their kids lives... a lotta parents already have full control on their kids minds... lol (A buddy got his entire record colection thrown out by his mother... woo!)

morally i have no problem with this... definitely instrumentalization of human life at its earliest form but... plenty of embryo's are lost in attempted (but failed) pregnancies around the world... if we dont have moral problems with those lost embryo's... why should we have with those under a microscope? ô.O.

Anyways.. Happy Cruise Wesley! And welcome to Secondhandsmoke Alex, Jennifer and Bobby :) Enjoy your stay :)

 
At May 24, 2008 , Blogger Bernhardt Varenius said...

Ricardo writes:

plenty of embryo's are lost in attempted (but failed) pregnancies around the world... if we dont have moral problems with those lost embryo's... why should we have with those under a microscope?

Plenty of adults die around the world every day too. Does that give us the right to treat and dispose of adults in whatever way we see fit? This is poor reasoning, Ricardo.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home