Monday, May 19, 2008

Sex Change Treatment for 7 Year Olds!

This seems to me to be unethical human experimentation: A doctor in Boston gives hormones to children who believe themselves to be transgendered to help prevent puberty and move them toward a sex change. From the story:

Boston's Children's Hospital bills itself as the hospital for children--and now it's also the hospital for children who want a sex change, a procedure some critics are calling "barbaric." Dr. Norman Spack, a pediatric specialist at the hospital, has launched a clinic for transgendered kids--boys who feel like girls, girls who want to be boys-- and he's opening his doors to patients as young as 7. Spack offers his younger patients counseling and drugs that delay the onset of puberty.

The drugs stop the natural flood of hormones that would make it difficult to have a sex alteration later in life, allowing patients more time to decide whether they want to make the change.

Spack also offers some teenagers hormone therapy, a drastic step that changes the way they grow and develop. While the effects of drug treatments can be stopped, long-term hormone therapy can be irreversible, causing permanent infertility in both sexes.

We have no true understanding of the causes of transexualism. We don't know that a kid who is seven and thinks he is a girl will still feel that way when he is 20. He might. Some transexuals report having those feelings very early. But we don't know how many people there might be who felt that way at 7 but don't at 20.

Worse, to medically intervene with strong hormones--the long term impact on the child's body and mental state we cannot know--when there is no underlying physical disease requiring the treatment, is to me, abuse. What if it causes cancer in 20 years? What if it impacts on the children of these children? What if the hormones impact their emotional and mental states, perhaps influencing their transexuality? We can't know the answers. All of this is just too new.

I am reminded of "Ashley's treatment," in which a profoundly disabled girl's normal physical development was interfered with through surgery and hormones to allow better ease of care. Caring motives notwithstanding, that was wrong, at least without a court order, as the hospital so admitted.

And now this: According to the story the Europeans are already traveling this path. And of course, NPR has come out with a properly nonjudgmental feature story:
The hormone blockers are the first stage of the treatment, but there's a second stage that's possible. Once children have postponed puberty for three or four years, at around age 16 they can choose to begin maturing sexually into the opposite gender, the gender they want to become. To do this, they begin taking the hormones of the opposite sex. For males, taking estrogen at this point will bring on breast and hip growth--and all the attributes physical and emotional of females. The reverse will happen for girls who take testosterone. Spack says this treatment can help make an adult transgender male almost indistinguishable from a biological male in terms of physical appearance. "We can make it possible that they can fit in in the way they want to. It is really quite amazing," he says.
This is unconscionable and reflects how sick our culture is becoming--and I am not referring to transgendered people. The inability or unwillingness by a growing number of us to make any judgments that might be criticized as moralism--lest one be denigrated as a bigot, premodern, or a hypocrite--has created a moral vacuum in which very little remains out of bounds. And the worst part is that the greatest victims in the ongoing and utter collapse of norms are our children.

Labels:

8 Comments:

At May 19, 2008 , Blogger Steve said...

There was a show on PBS recently about the East German's doping of their Olympic athletes. The women were given steroids to bring out male characteristics.

One of the women, a shot-putter, wound up having a sex-change and is now married to a woman. Another woman, a swimmer, I think, also has had problems with her sexual identity.

I'm wondering what effect the steroids had on that, and how many other athletes have similar problems.

 
At May 20, 2008 , Blogger Lydia McGrew said...

"...all the attributes physical and emotional of females."

Rubbish. Need I state the obvious? It does not replace their male organs with a uterus and other female organs. It does not make them able to have a child.

But since when did having babies mean anything to such people about nature?

 
At May 20, 2008 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I like this blog. This blog deals with logic and reason, not emotion.

 
At May 20, 2008 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

Thanks how it is. Stop by any time.

 
At May 20, 2008 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At May 20, 2008 , Blogger K-Man said...

In this dawning era of designer children, it should be obvious whom these procedures are really designed to benefit: not the child, but the parents who had a boy but really wanted a girl or vice versa. Now those parents can get their desire met.

Can anyone really picture a 7-year-old girl saying, "I really want to be a boy"? Or a boy saying he wanted to be a girl? And either one being so insistent about a gender change that such medical intervention to make it happen is seen as warranted? Me neither. Maybe it's happened, but it must be rare.

My understanding is that adults going through sex change procedures must go through serious psychological counseling first, and only then comes the go-ahead to start the process. Somehow, I have a problem picturing a 7-year-old kid receiving (and benefitting from) similar counseling. But if the parents are pushing the issue for their own motives, such niceties might get overlooked, especially given the profit for the medical facilities involved.

Enjoy your cruise, Wesley.

 
At May 22, 2008 , Blogger John Howard said...

We have a duty to protect the rights of children that trumps the right of legal parents over their children. Society only charges the parents with the responsibility of caring for their legal children as long as they do it to acceptable standards.

And one of the rights of people is to not be sterilized, we have an obligation to protect people's fertility, both that of adults and especially children. (Adults have to prove to us they aren't duressed or temporarily confused before we let them choose to sterilize themselves)

This is especially disturbing when we consider that people are going to be claiming a right to use genetically modified gametes to conceive with/as either sex soon. They are creating people to be their justification to do genetic engineering when these kids grow up. The only way for people to think this is OK is if they believe that they will have the right and the ability to conceive as a woman or man. If we make the law that would prohibit people from conceiving with modified gametes that do not fully represent the genes they are born with, then they wouldn't be able to pretend that these kids aren't being sterilized and denied their basic civil rights. But if we don't make that law, it's much harder to argue that. We need that law, ASAP, before any more people are sterilized. It's our duty to protect them.

 
At May 29, 2008 , Blogger Unknown said...

Even though I am transgendered, I was shocked when I heard that a clinic in Boston was providing sex changes to kids as young as seven. I wrote my thoughts about the pros and cons of offering a sex change so early here: Child Sex Change
I believe there are better ways to avoid suicide than providing a sex change to children.

Hugs,
Vanessa
http://www.crossdresserheaven.com

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home