"Our Posthuman Future: On the Small Screen"
I have a piece in this week's Weekly Standard on The 4400, an interesting sci-fi program on USA Network. Here's an excerpt:
If you haven't seen the program, check it out. It's fun and there is grist for the gray matter.The 4400 began as a run-of-the-mill diversion about how the world reacts to 4,400 people, abducted by aliens, who return (apparently) from the future, each possessing a unique ability. Unexpectedly, at the end of last season, the show took a sharp turn for the better through a clever plot device: Jordan Collier, the villain (or hero), learns how to distill a substance called Promicin from the blood of the 4,400. Collier and fellow "revolutionaries" decide to change the world by distributing the stuff to anyone willing to risk a 50 percent chance of death to experience transcendence in a syringe. The program has ever since been exploring some of the most important cultural cross-currents of our time.
Take, for example, the malaise many apparently feel because they live ordinary lives. The 4400 writers understand this, and thus many of the characters risk taking Promicin rather than live one more day of quiet desperation. Better yet, the characters' lives are transformed without their having to work for it. For example, one Promicin-taker goes from pathetic loser to well-paid and respected FBI interrogator after Promicin gives her the ability to force people to tell the truth.
In real life many people do yearn for extraordinariness to be handed to them on a silver platter. We see this propensity throughout the culture; from the explosive growth of cosmetic surgery, to the increased use of ster-oids, to the desperate craving to touch the lives and thus share in the glamour of celebrities, to the popularity of reality television programs that offer average people the chance to become stars just by playing themselves. The 4400 producers understand well the seductive nature of their premise: They even have a spot on the program's website dedicated to a "fan of the week" who gains the honor by explaining which super-ability he or she would want, and for what purpose...
It's hard to watch the show and not be reminded of the sad "transhumanists"--real life wannabe 4,400s--who are so frustrated by normalcy that they invest all their hopes and dreams in somehow managing to transcend human limitations through the miracles of modern technology. And so they spend their days sharing visions of uploaded minds dwelling immortally in computer software "platforms" while they earnestly wait for "the singularity," a pending technological tipping point of such seismic power that transhumanists believe it will lead--literally--to the creation of a posthuman race. (See my June 26, 2006, WEEKLY STANDARD article, "The Catman Cometh.")
Okay, now I am off to Italy.
Labels: The 4400. Transhumanist TV


4 Comments:
Wesley, Transhumanism is not so much about being extraordinary as it is about continuing to improve ordinary, as human civilization has done for millenia. We are already extraordinary compared to previous species of our genus, and particularly compared to species outside our genus. Indeed, this is the basis for your philosophy of human exceptionalism.
Lincoln: I think you are an exception to the rule as a transhumanist. I have attended a transhumanist conference at Stanford. I have read the literature. I have read (and reviewed) James Hughes' book. It is as I have described. See my Weekly Standard piece, The Catman Cometh.
To the best of my knowledge, James advocates broad availability of technological enhancements, reflecting his liberal political values. Such policies would change that which we mean by "ordinary" persons rather than producing a few extraordinary persons. I don't think your comments in this blog post accurately present James' perspective.
Beyond that, while James is an influential Transhumanist, he is not the only one. If you have not read "Engines of Creation" by Drexler or "The Singularity is Near" by Kurzweil, I recommend them to you.
Finally, I'll mention that I am not the only Transhumanist with the perspective expressed in my first comment. If you'd like, I'll ask some others to post their agreement to this thread. :-)
I'm with Lincoln. I really think that you have the wrong idea about transhumanists. Having met Bostrom (at the CBC TechnoSapiens conference a couple of years back) I don't think that he resembles your straw man "transhumanist" at all.
There may be some folks that are as you describe but your brush is too broad by far.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home