Friday, April 13, 2007

Assisted Suicide: Refusing to Connect the Dots

The other day, the Sacramento Bee editorialized in favor of assisted suicide. Now, it runs this story about how state investigators are inadequately auditing nursing homes and busting unsafe operators. Here's the story:

The California Department of Health Services is underestimating the severity of safety problems at some nursing homes and fails to promptly investigate at least half of the thousands of complaints it receives about the facilities each year, the state auditor reported Thursday.

The Health Department is responsible for oversight of the 1,200 nursing homes in the state, and the department's duties include responding to complaints and conducting routine inspections.

The auditor's study also found that the department fails to communicate quickly with people who make the complaints and keeps poor records of investigations.

In a written response to the audit, the health department blamed a staffing shortage. There is a 16 percent vacancy rate for registered nurses who evaluate nursing homes, largely because the state has trouble competing with private health-care providers who pay more, the report said.
What the MSM continually refuses to do is connect the dots from stories such as this to the ridiculous premise that "guidelines will protect against abuse" in a legalized assisted suicide regimen. In Oregon, "regulators" from the State Dept. of Health admit that they have no authority or budget to investigate abuses: Mostly, bureaucrats merely compile data for publication from the lethally prescribing doctors, do a little spot checking, publish the data and then destroy all the supporting documentation. In other words, the guidelines are mere facades: They are not substantial protections.

Labels:

3 Comments:

At April 13, 2007 , Blogger Tony Jones said...

Well, many elderly people kill themselves rather than go into a nursing home. Should we therefore outlaw nursing homes?

 
At April 13, 2007 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

No, Tony. We need to see that the concept of guidelines protecting against abuse is just a meaningless slogan. The state would not exercise any control, nor, as in Oregon, would it care to.

 
At April 13, 2007 , Blogger Tony Jones said...

But all prohibition does it drive it underground. You won't see too many doctors or nurses volunteering to incriminate themselves.

In Australia, Brendan Nelson, the former head of the AMA, said that if family members want to assist a patient's death, it would be easier to do it when it was illegal. All they'd need to do would be to keep it a secret and cremate the body as soon as possible.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home