Wednesday, April 11, 2007

Bush Stem Cell Statement



Here is the statement issued today by the White House about the passage of Senate Bills 5 (overturn Bush funding policy) and 30 (fund "alternative" approaches). Agree or disagree with the Bush policy, I think this point made by the President is absolutely true:

My policy unleashed an unprecedented scientific effort using the stem cell lines my policy approved for funding. While encouraging--not banning-- research, my policy also ensures that federal funds are not used to create incentives to destroy, or harm, or create living human embryos for purposes of research...

Meanwhile, exciting and significant scientific advances have been reported over the past few years on uses of stem cells that do not involve the destruction of embryos. These advances using adult and other forms of stem cells are exciting. Some have even produced effective therapies and treatments for disease--all without the destruction of human life.
I believe that the President's policy helped create the environment in which these "alternative" advances have flourished, as well as boosting the drive to find adult stem cell therapies. But be that as it may, you have to say this for the President: He has remained steadfast in defending his principles and even though under withering political pressure, has been as good as his word.

Labels:

4 Comments:

At April 12, 2007 , Blogger Tony Jones said...

http://www.idrewthis.org/comics/idt20060801children.png

Too bad cuntservatives like him cut all funding for people after they're born. They'll force women to give birth, but they won't fund life-saving medical treatment.

 
At April 12, 2007 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

This isn't about defending or criticizing Bush's presidency, but once again Tony, you just get your facts wrong. Who do you think pushed through prescription drug benefits for seniors under Medicare? George W. Bush.

 
At April 12, 2007 , Blogger Pedro said...

Nasty new piece of legislation.

Yes, it seems that conservatives are by now the only ones to have a clear stance on what a human being is, or at least on the value of his/her life.

As a scientist, I am amazed at what some "scientific" doctors dare do in the name of "science".

Do not take life in order to give life. That seems to me easy enough to get?

 
At April 12, 2007 , Blogger Tony Jones said...

Are you referring to a law passed to prevent the elderly from going to Canada and getting prescription drugs that they can actually afford?

Pedro: "Do not take life in order to give life."

Whoops. I guess we can't kill in self-defence or "just wars" anymore, now can we?

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home