Wednesday, December 20, 2006

American Public Health Association Goes Postmodern

Facts don't matter any more, only narratives. And now this deconstruction of reality is infecting biology and medicine.

I have previously described here and in my other writing about how the term human embryo has been redefined from a scientific understanding, meaning the human organism from day one through the eighth week, into a political one--meaning that "it" (whatever it is) only becomes an embryo after implantation. This was done, as pro cloner and ESCR Princeton biologist Lee Silver wrote on page 39 of Remaking Eden, with a specific purpose in mind:"I'll let you in on a secret. The term pre-embryo has been embraced wholeheartedly by IVF parishioners for reasons that are political, not scientific. The new term is used to provide the illusion that there is something profoundly different between what nonmedical biologists still call a six-day old embryo and what we and everyone else calls a sixteen-day-old embryo."

And it works. The media goes along and soon an embryo is no longer an embryo, meaning that it is no longer a human organism, meaning it isn't human life, meaning we can use it like a corn crop.

Now, the American Public Health Association has agreed to assisted suicide advocates' insistence to redefine the descriptive and accurate term "assisted suicide" into the euphemistic and politicized "aid in dying." LB-06-02 End-of-Life Choices--Urges health educators, policy-makers, journalists and health care providers to recognize that the choice of a mentally competent, terminally ill person to choose to self-administer medications to bring about a peaceful death is not 'suicide,' nor is the prescribing of such medication by a physician 'assisted suicide.' Urges terms such as 'aid in dying' or 'patient-directed dying' be used to describe such a choice."

This is pure politics, of course. It isn't medicine. And it isn't health.

We are entering a Salvatore Dali surreal world. Words mean nothing other than what we want them to at the moment, and this is changeable from moment to moment. Clocks run backwards. Up is down and east is west. The moon is made of blue cheese, if that serves our purposes. And the basic institutions of society are being steadily corrupted.

2 Comments:

At December 21, 2006 , Blogger Lydia McGrew said...

A few years ago I saw somewhere or other a claim that "pre-embryo" refers to the egg frozen at the moment that the sperm has penetrated it but before fertilization has been completed with the union of the DNA of the sperm and egg.

I was suspicious then and now, of course, see that 'pre-embryo' is being used openly to refer to a very early embryo. That's obvious. There couldn't be development and so forth over a period of days if we were talking about a suspended-animation conglomerate of the egg and sperm before completion of fertilization.

But for the record: Is the claim to be able to freeze eggs at that precise moment and before completion of fertilization as bogus as it sounds? Or can they really do that in the lab? And if so, do they ever make any serious effort to do it?

 
At December 21, 2006 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

Not sure. Today, pre embryo is a political term used to pretend that ESCR or other early embryo research does not destroy a human organism. It is post modernism come to biology. What something IS, isn't what matters, it is what we want it to be.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home