Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Final Exit Network "Ring" of Suicide Assisters Arrested

The Final Exit Network is dedicated to assisted suicide. More honestly than some in the euthanasia movement, its members openly acknowledge that the "ultimate civil liberty" should not be limited to the terminally ill.

It has long been suspected that some members of the FEN are not willing to wait until the law changes to assist in suicides. Some old time SHSers may recall the case in Phoenix in which it seemed pretty clear that a FEN member helped assist the suicide of a woman with a mental illness.

Nothing came of that case in terms of criminal culpability, but now some arrests have been made in a series of assisted suicides in several states. From the story:

Four members of an alleged assisted suicide ring were charged Wednesday with helping a 58-year-old Georgia man end his life, and investigators in eight other states were looking into whether the group was involved in more deaths.

The FBI is also probing the Final Exit Network, an organization whose Web site said it is "dedicated to serving people who are suffering from an intolerable condition." It wasn't immediately clear how many deaths were being investigated. On Wednesday, investigators raided the homes of the group's volunteers in seven of the states, a group office in Georgia and a company in Montana that authorities said supplied items used in suicides, according to a news release from authorities in Arizona, where another death was being investigated...The four were charged with assisted suicide, tampering with evidence and a violation of Georgia's anti-racketeering act.
The victim's mother says her son was depressed but if he had the "courage" to kill himself with help, she doesn't want to see any arrests.

Well, it isn't up to her. I know other cases apparently involving the FEN in which bereaved family members were horrified at what happened and yearned to see justice done.

When we ponder this matter, I think it is important to understand that people who are this deeply involved in helping make other people dead are what I call "death fundamentalists," that is, they are not just selfless altruists, but act on a deep ideological belief and an odd form of twisted desire. Lest you think that judgment harsh, allow me to quote from A Chosen Death, written by Lonny Shavelson, who is pro assisted suicide and observed "Sarah" from the Hemlock Society as she plied her trade. On page 75, she tells Shavelson that after assisting her first suicide of a good friend, she came to relish--one is tempted to say "get off"--on the experience:
I firmly believe now that the most intimate moment you can share with a person is their death. More than sex. More than birth. More than anything. I was at the deliveries of my four grandchildren, and my experience with Naomi's death was above that.
Later in the book, Sarah murders "Gene," who tries to back out of his assisted suicide after swallowing the poisonous concoction Sarah prepared, but is prevented by Sarah who brutally holds a plastic bag around his head as she croons, "The light Gene, go toward the light." As I noted in Forced Exit, Shavelson writes of witnessing this involuntary killing, but did nothing to stop it and never called police.

So, let's see where this case leads. If they did the deed or deeds, I hope the judge throws the book at them. But don't count on serious punishment. The idea of suicide as a "necessity" for people in difficult circumstances is gaining traction, putting the most vulnerable among us at a terrible risk.

Labels:

15 Comments:

At February 26, 2009 , Blogger SAFEpres said...

I read about Gene in Not Dead Yet and it made me sick. I cannot believe that the authorities have not done anything to that woman or to Shavbelson, even after this became public.

 
At February 26, 2009 , Blogger Lydia McGrew said...

Good grief! Can't they press charges over "Gene"? Can it really be so hard to find out who he was? That even shocks me, and I usually sit around and say, "Ayep, expected that."

 
At February 26, 2009 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

Lydia: Can't press charges when Shavelson didn't report it and the names are pseudonyms.

 
At February 26, 2009 , Blogger Lydia McGrew said...

I guess it just seems like there should be some way to find out who he was by other evidence and open a case on it. Then couldn't Shavelson's book be brought in as evidence, or couldn't he be subpoenaed to testify on pain of contempt of court or something? I can't help feeling that if "Gene" were the President of the United States or someone else important they'd find a way to use the book as a key to the case.

 
At February 26, 2009 , Blogger SAFEpres said...

I wonder why, moreover, Shavelson wasn't prosecuted for being an accessory to murder, as he admitted to this in his book?

 
At February 26, 2009 , Blogger SAFEpres said...

P.S.-I meant, Forced Exit rather than Not Dead Yet.

 
At February 26, 2009 , Blogger Lydia McGrew said...

I'm beginning to have an inkling. If he gave no location as well as changing the names of the victims, it would be unclear which prosecutor even had jurisdiction over the case.

 
At February 26, 2009 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

I was on a show with Shavelson years ago. I confronted him about the murder off stage, as it were, and he hemmed and hawed and stuttered. I really unloaded. Don't recall if we got into it on air.

Post script: The PBS show never had me on again.

Post Post Script. He's an MD.

 
At February 26, 2009 , Blogger bmmg39 said...

What program was it?

 
At February 26, 2009 , Blogger Betsy Powell said...

The AP story that just came out quotes Barbara Coombs Lee, president of the national advocacy group Compassion and Choices: "Prosecuting assisted suicide only drives it underground. It's not the way to make it safe. The plastic bag is sort of the end-of-life equivalent of the coat hanger."

What verbal engineering! "Safe" for whom?

 
At February 26, 2009 , Blogger bmmg39 said...

-- 'cuz, y'know, if we drove assisted suicide underground, someone might be killed...

 
At February 26, 2009 , Blogger Unknown said...

That type always hems and haws and stutters. Society allows them to walk among us. Not everyone is as good as everyone else, and deserves the same consideration.

 
At February 27, 2009 , Blogger Unknown said...

Had been surfing hundreds of webpages that day, but it was the alert that came across about this story that finally stopped me in my tracks night before last now.. Laid down and went to sleep wondering just what kind of people, you know..? Then to find out it happened one county over from me.. :shakes head:

Number One, HUGE Kudos to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation (GBI) whom I've seen referenced as pulling a Law & Order'esque stunt to catch these folks.. My Heroes yet again..

Number Two (and not necessarily in that order), Thank You, Wesley, for having this post ready and waiting AGAIN this week.. I referenced it on our local WSB-TV station's article on the same.. Hoping you'll forgive me for pulling a quote or two, too.. :GRIN:

To use "interesting" in describing the reactions left on WSB's article is putting it mildly..

In Loving Unity from Talking Rock..

 
At February 27, 2009 , Blogger Unknown said...

SAFE? SAFE? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
At March 03, 2009 , Blogger Unknown said...

If "toward the light" is such a great trip, why don't they take it themselves. If they are looking forward to doing that themselves one day, then they are projecting their own desires onto others. No matter which way one looks at it, it's sick, and the ones "helping others die" are sick. The problem with this society is that when there's a serious problem like this people aren't willing to do something radical about it. The courts are not enough. It's the society that the courts are part of that nurtured these creeps into existence and allowed what they are doing to happen.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home