Unconditional Love of a Child With Severe Disabilities
This is a story about love. It is also a story about community. And, for some, it will be perceived as a story about taking the reverence for life beyond reasonable limits.
A child became profoundly disabled in a terrible mishap and now, having suffered a catastrophic brain injury, requires full-time high tech medical support and full time care. And despite the urgings of some to "let him go," he remains a loved and cherished member of his family. But trouble is brewing. From the story:
[Val} Decker says, this little boy is loved just the same, despite critics who say there is no child, no life there, worth preserving. "People think this mom is crazy," she says as she sits in the living room of their home near Anne Sullivan Elementary in Sioux Falls. " 'She needs to turn off the ventilator and let him go,' they say. "But Landon is not brain dead; he's brain damaged. There's something still within this person. And it's not within my power to take it away." [snip]Some consider costs of care to be an issue:
Decker's husband--Landon's father--has left the marriage and the home, giving up many of his rights and decision-making powers concerning his son, Val Decker says. When contacted, he did not want to talk about the situation. Now, Val Decker faces the new year uncertain about the insurance coverage that has helped provide much of the constant nursing care her son needs. She is unsure there will be money to make mortgage payments on their house. A nurse by profession, she is looking for work so she can pay the bills. But it's been a struggle to find a job that will allow her to leave when the ventilator-trained nurses she has hired to care for her son are unavailable, she says.
So friends have started a benefit fund at Wells Fargo Bank branches to raise money to help her keep a roof over her family's heads.
The more pertinent discussion here, the doctor says, involves questions that little boys such as Landon "make all of us ask."It's a long piece and worth the read. But what struck me powerfully when reading the story is that very few would judge a parent who made a contrary decision in such a case and decided to remove the respirator and allow nature to take its course. But time and again, we see people who love their children come what may--Terri Schiavo's parents come to mind--criticized and pilloried for refusing to let go.
"Questions like, 'What is reality?' " Kidman says. "What really matters?' And 'What is love?' "
The reality of Landon Decker's situation is that the cost of his care, through Medicaid and insurance, is expensive. Paying for a ventilator and monitors and 24-hour-a-day nursing care adds up. In a country with finite resources available for situations such as Landon's, "I can understand that side of the discussion," Kidman says. "So the question then is, 'What type of life is worth pouring resources into?' " he says. "We tend to put more on the humanity side than the financial side of that discussion. "I can tell you that the people who interact with Landon and his family seem to be softer in their hearts. They seem to have gained something from being involved in Landon's life and are better for it."
Such are the times in which we live, I guess. But we should also not forget the witness of people like Val Decker and those who help support her, who by their radical self giving illustrate the power, depth, and strength that comes from unconditional love.
HT: Aaron Levisay


12 Comments:
It's hard not to wish bad things upon those who would equate this child's life with "a profound philosophical dillemna" encountered in a philosophy class instead of viewing him as a human being with the right to whatever he needs to live. Digusting.
If healthcare becomes nationalized, and the govn't refuses to fund this kind of treatment, I will stop paying my taxes. It's ridiculous to argue that healthcare is for otherwise healthy or nondisabled people-that's just discrimination/master-racism, poor and simple.
Wow, they really pressed that doctor in the interviewing, didn't they? It was obvious they were trying to get him to say something critical of the mother. He handled it well, it looks like to me, and the interviewer at least had the professionalism to relay what he said, even though he didn't give the answer that was obviously being sought.
I wonder about the father.
I can't really figure how a man can just walk away from his family like that. I hope that at least he is helping to support them in some way.
It is disappointing that the father has left. It would be easier if she had the loving support of a husband.
She is very courageous.
I don't know the father of this innocent sick child but from what I’ve read, he at least is not fighting the mother's loving decision which seems like one good thing we could say about him. When it comes to other matters, God is the only One who has the right to Judge.
As for this Venerable Accessible Lady, all I have to say at this time is keep on doing what you believe is right and I'm sure that through Jesus, we'll all be blessed in many loving ways which will someday eventually boggle the mind of Time.
God Bless All His Children,
Peace
'In those heartbreaking moments, a bubbly, inquisitive infant just starting to explore the world on two wobbly legs went away, leaving behind this child in a coma.'
Uh, no, he didn't go away, he went *into* the coma. That child is still there, since he didn't die. Or are they claiming his soul left his body when he became disabled?
'First he says: "When you consider that there have been people who wake up from comas years later, albeit rare, obviously they weren't brain dead. If they were, they wouldn't have awakened."'
Brilliantly put. There's this thing in science called 'uniformitarianism,' meaning what we see in repeated in nature is something we expect to see, since there is uniformity to nature. For example, stars explode a certain way, and we expect to see that happen because of what we have recorded from our observations. Likewise, we know that from others who *have* woken up that they still remain ensouled, even though in a coma, and likewise, we know that people remain ensouled when brain damaged. Therefore, this little boy has his soul still, is still alive, and shouldn't be toyed with for some agenda.
'But Landon running?
"This side of heaven?" Kidman says. "I don't see any evidence that will happen unless God allows for a miracle. I hope I get to be the first to see Landon running on the other side."'
But just because the boy won't run doesn't mean he's worth less than a child who grows up to be a football player. Hell, given that many football players end up in jail on drug or sexual abuse charges, maybe this kid got the better deal.
'" 'She needs to let him go,' " Decker recalls the aide saying. "I informed them that I was there, and that he has a spirit and hears what they say, and he didn't appreciate their negative thoughts."'
There was a study done on an unconscious woman who could not move, who was encouraged to think of herself playing tennis. Even though she couldn't move or respond to the doctors, they monitored her brain activity and found that the same parts of her brain that would 'light up' in an active person were lighting up in the scan. She was envisioning herself moving and running, just as they asked her to. Maybe because he was so young he can't comprehend all of the words that people speak around him, but on some level he's in there and able to understand the feelings of others who are close to him, and she's right. He doesn't need that kind of negative talk.
'He does respond to them, his mother and the nurses who care for him say. ... She was praying, she says, when she walked over to the window and opened the blinds.
"As soon as I did, he turned all the way in his little crib to where the window is," she recalls. "My mother was there, and he squeezed her hand."
These days, they say they see changes in the countenance on his face when they read to him. He startles at the sound of thunder, his mother says.'
See? He doesn't need to comprehend everything, every word or ever sound, to know something is going on around him. That's all the proof that I need that he's still in there and still going strong!
'To Kidman, responses like those speak more to a brain reflex than a simple involuntary, spinal cord reaction.
"The kind of emotive responses they say he has to their washing his hair or being near him would indicate brain activity," he says.'
What further proof is anyone looking for? Look, the brain stem doesn't provide much more than the average chicken's life, let's be honest. There are stories of headless chickens running around still alive because they had enough brain stem to provide them with basic instincts. That's fine, they don't need higher levels of brain activity. They were made with a purpose that doesn't involve high emotion.
Human beings, on the other hand, show emotional changes, because we're a higher order of creature (and yes, because we're made in God's image, but that's not necessary to believe to understand the science). His reactions are *emotional,* not simplified instinct or reflex. That mean's he's still in there, profoundly disabled but still very much alive.
I'll pray for this woman - she deserves it.
Yeah, all that stuff about his "going away" reminds me of the horrible tombstone that Michael Schiavo put up that said that Terri "left this world" or something kooky like that at the time of her accident. It's funny that people who probably don't believe in the soul suddenly become intensely metaphysical when they can use spiritual-sounding phrases to further their agenda. Suddenly they start talking like they can tell that this person "left" at a certain time and even (in this case) that a different person "came." It's creepy. I mean, if you don't have a real theology, don't just start making up some half-baked nut-jobbery as you go along!
>It's creepy. I mean, if you don't have a real theology, don't just start making up some half-baked nut-jobbery as you go along!<
I'm not exactly sure who those remarks were directed at but as far as I'm concerned, I believe that we're still all entitled to our opinion and I like to think that there's probably still a lot of good left in Val's husband.
Maybe you could enlighten us as to how terrible this man really is other than comparing him to someone else? You might be right that he's in need of more prayer but could you please try and educate us without all that mud slinging!
God Bless,
Peace
Victor -
I don't think that comment of Lydia's was actually directed at the husband (of whom I have no opinion, other than to pray for him; my own brother in law left my sister after their autistic son hit his teens and proved to be too much for him to handle, yet I still love the man).
I think that it was more of a general complaint about people who turn to metaphysical speech in an effort to get believers to kill a profoundly disabled loved one. Like... okay, I don't know anybody who fits this profile so I'm making someone up. Theoretical Atheist #1 (TA#1 for short) says that he doesn't believe in a God or afterlife.
Theoretical Fine (TF for short, i.e. me) suddenly has a Disabled Son who is in a coma.
TA#1, in an effort to convince me to kill my son, says, "He's not in there anymore."
I say, "If you don't believe in a soul, then you don't believe he was in there to begin with, so since his body is still alive, he's as much there as he ever was, right?"
TA#1 says, "Well, what kind of a life will he have living like that? Don't you think he'd be happier if he weren't suffering so?"
I reply, "How can he be 'happier' if he ceases to exist completely? Shouldn't I struggle to keep him alive just because to do otherwise relegate him to complete dissolution and nothing more than rotting dust?"
And the argument continues.
So that's more what I read from Lydia's statement in response to my post. Lydia's statement doesn't really flow with anything I read earlier about the father.
Thank you for your thoughts T E Fine on my comment about Lydia's.
God Bless,
Peace
It didn't seem to me that Lydia's comments were directed at anyone, except maybe those who would do as Michael Schiavo did. I like what you said, Lydia.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home