Tai the Elephant Can't Feel Demeaned
All I can say is, "Oh, bru--u--ther:" Animal rights activists are claiming that surrounding an elephant named Tai with a huge soap bubble--as an art project--would be "be thoroughly demeaning to Tai." This comment from Mark Bekoff from the University of Colo
rado is typical:
I find the idea of enclosing an elephant in a giant bubble to be done by the Santa Ana Science Center to be one of the most egregious instances of animal abuse I've read about recently.Really? An animal surrounded by a soap bubble is egregious abuse, indeed worse than those downer animals at the meat packing plant exposed a few weeks ago? Bekoff goes on:
I've noted that "Tai's owner, Kari Johnson of Have Trunk Will Travel of Perris, said, 'I don't know or care if this is for science. It is something neat to do. It helps conservation. People learn about these animals and that makes them more likely to help them in the future.' Of course she would defend this thoroughly misguided and outrageous project by saying it'll help elephant conservation, but this is a flat out misstatement. And how insulting to Tai and to Ms. Johnson to diss science and to say it’s "neat to do."Another elephant in the bubble hysteric waxes in a similar vein:
Not only is this demeaning to the animal, it is downright cruel. These are regal, very special animals who are threatened in the wild, and now it appears, in captivity as wellSuch hyper emotionalism and anthropomorphism over a dumb but harmless idea. Listen up: Tai can't be demeaned. She cannot feel insulted. She is an animal. She may be very intelligent but elephants don't possess the kind of moral consciousness that would permit her to experience the chagrin of being humiliated. Scared? Perhaps. Uncomfortable? Sure. But only people can be insulted, only people feel demeaned.
The show has been called off due to the silly fuss--no big loss one way or the other. But please: Putting a soap bubble around an elephant would not be grounds to unleash the ALF thugs. Bad art, maybe. But hardly the stuff that should cause strong emotions to flare.
Labels: Elephants Can't be Demeaned


6 Comments:
Wesley:
'Listen up: Tai can't be demeaned. She cannot feel insulted. She is an animal.'
Forgive me - this is a head-scratch moment - what does insult have to do with moral judgment?
Anyone can be insulted by anything. Insult is when someone is offended by something another person does. It's a sort of emotional annoyance - nowhere near pain - and I don't see why an animal can't feel it.
Naturally I'm talking about the sort of insult a cat feels when you buy her the wrong kibble and she must punish you by trying to bury it and then refusing to let you pet her all night. It's not like humans who put more than simple feeling to it - people ascribe much more to insult than just feeling irritated. In that respect, no, animals don't feel "insulted," but I do think they can feel something similar.
Naturally, that doesn't stop me from dressing my cats in baby doll clothes. (No, I don't really do that anymore, but it used to be funny.) And even if Tai was insulted that she was stuck in a bubble, she'd handle it in a typical animal fashion - snub her human Mama until Mama gave her goodies or something to win back her affection.
Personally, I think it's a cool art project as long as the animal comes to no physical harm. And seirously, a *Soap Bubble?!* That's not going to hurt her! I wish they'd done it. Animals like pretty things and cool things and she might have been intrigued by the colors on the surface of the bubble. Jeez.
If it hurt her, I'd be against it. If it doesn't, what the heck? She'll be insulted, she'll snub until she's appeased, and she'll forget all about it when dinner time rolls around and Mama gives her ears a good scratching.
Oh, quick add-on here:
They can be "insulted" but Wes is right, they can't be demeaned. Insulted is when you do something to annoy them and they snub you. Demeaned means they're being treated like dirt emotionally, and unless you're abusing them, they can't be treated like dirt.
T.E. Fine: Are elephants entitled to a dignified existence? Google "Martha Nussbaum moral status of animals". You may find the essay interesting.
Aeolus -
I dont' know if I'd say "entitled." It's more like this - both animals and humans over-identify with creatures of different species. Humans anthropomorphise their pets and work animals, and animals will zoomorphise humans and other animals. Comes from living together and getting used to each other.
Animals that live with human beings will act out in similar ways to what humans do. A human eats at the table, so her cat feels she must eat at the table, too. A human knows how to open the front door, the cat tries to open the front door. A human snubs someone when she is offended, so kitty snubs someone when she doesn't get her way.
So naturally animals will do things similar to their human family members. If Tai lives with people who show a wide range of emotions around her, she'll likely mimick those emotions and probably gets "offended" by things.
Animals are "entitled" to humane treatment because they don't belong to us, naturally - we're only allowed to use them within the guidelines of care that were given by The Powers That Be. So they can be used as beasts of burden, food, clothing, etc. They can't be tortured, starved, or otherwise abused.
My statement about them being offended is simply that I think they do possess the ability to "feel offended," but it's nothing like what we feel, it's generally only among animals that zoomorphise humans (and thus have lots of human contact) and is easily overcome by large amounts of treats and indulgence by the human mom.
I just don't think the feeling of offense is a moral issue - animals don't have morals 'cause they do what they're supposed to do according to the nature they were given. But animals can feel happy, sad, afraid, uncomfortable, playful, friendly, curious, etc. None of those feelings are associated with morality. I just think that "offended" falls into the same category. That's all.
Have we really gotten to this insane anthropomorphic point in time where we feel that animals are actually image conscious?
David: Good question. Alas, I think so.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home