In California Assisted Suicide Advocates Again Undermine Medicine
For shame! Assemblywoman Patti Berg and Assemblyman Lloyd Levine are at it again in the California Legislature. Soon to be term limited out of office, desperate to pass a bill--any bill-- that will open the door to assisted suicide/euthanasia, thwarted in their desire by a powerful and diverse strange political bedfellow coalition including disability rights activists, medical professionals, activists for the poor, pro lifers, and the Catholic Church, they have found a new way to undermine the delivery of proper medical care.In place of assisted suicide, they now want to legalize doctors placing their patients into drug-induced comas and dehydrating them to death. Just as bad, they co-opt the good and proper medical practice of "palliative sedation," which they redefine as a method of killing.
The bill is AB 2747. First, Berg and Levine define terminal illness as having one year or less to live--an extremely problematic matter since at that distance from death it can be very difficult to determine expected lifespan.
Then, comes the disgraceful redefinition of palliative sedation, which is properly used in rare cases at the very end of life for irremediable suffering such as agitation, at a time in which the patient generally dies of the disease, not denial of sustenance.
442 (d) "Palliative sedation" means the use of sedative medications to relieve extreme suffering by making the patient unaware and unconscious, while artificial food and hydration are withheld, during the progression of the disease leading to the death of the patient.
442.5 (5) The patient's right to comprehensive pain and symptom management at the end of life, including, but not limited to, adequate pain medication, treatment of nausea, palliative chemotherapy, relief of shortness of breath and fatigue, VSED [voluntary self starvation and dehydration], and palliative sedation.
442.7. If a physician does not wish to comply with his or her patient's choice of end-of-life options, the health care provider shall do both of the following: (a) Refer or transfer a patient to an alternative health care provider. (b) Provide the patient with information on procedures to transfer to an alternative health care provider.The medical profession should be up in arms. These petty politicians are corrupting medicine by establishing a false political definition for a proper palliative technique that, if passed, would result in terrible public confusion and distrust in palliative medicine overall. I repeat: For shame!
Labels: A.B. 2747



6 Comments:
I wonder how much of this would be an issue if different forms of pain medications were allowed...ie the opiate derivatives. To have concerns about addiction to such drugs seems both cruel and idiotic.
The cynic in me wonders how much of this is influenced by the political weight of the large drug manufacturers.
I think I would prefer being in a haze/daze (vs an induced coma) so as to at least be able to change my mind.
Mort (who can't believe some of this stuff)
This is _extremely_ bad stuff.
Can you give a link to the similar proposal in Vermont, Wesley? You mention it in the post above.
The Vermont bill is not so explicit, it seems to me, but could lead to the same result since terminal illness is one year also. http://www.leg.state.vt.us/docs/legdoc.cfm?URL=/docs/2008/bills/intro/H-804.HTM
I actually responded to the post that follows this one (I'm way behind - real life stinks that way), but as I said, when Dad was going through chemo, one thing that was brought up was "terminal sedation," which was presented as, "you are kept in a coma until death by natural causes." It wasn't his doctors who brought it up, by the way - there was an outside consultant who mentioned it. It was supposed to be a way of dealing with end-of-life problems without defying our Catholic belief in the sanctity of life. We don't do euthanasia, active or passive. There was no mention of dehydration or starvation, none.
While I appreciate that your opposition to this bill is due to your concern for the individual, I think it is pertinent to update your information regarding this bill. AB 2747 has been revised to exclude palliative sedation and VSED, voluntary stopping of eating and drinking, and the prognosis of "less than one year to live". Also admittedly it is difficult to determine how long one has to live once diagnosed with a terminal illness. However, I believe this law is in the interest of reducing an individual's suffering by requiring a greater timely effort by the health care provider (s) to provide the necessary end of life information to the patient and family. I hope that you will reconsider and support AB 2747. As a nursing student, I believe it is crucial that people are informed to make decisions regarding advance directives and their needs for hospice prior to entering into the most difficult and final stage of their illness.
CS, Sacramento
Orageblu: Do a search of the site and you will see that I have so noted that it was, in fact, gutted. Still a bad bill, but the worst of it was removed--at least for now.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home