Thursday, January 03, 2008

What If They Gave a Health Care Plan and Nobody Came?

This is an interesting turn of events: San Francisco has been abuzz about a new health care plan designed to cover everyone in the city. A court ruling has (for now) prevented City Commissars from taxing businesses to pay for it, and so for now the plan is temporarily scaled back to cover people who are at 300% of poverty level or less if they do not otherwise qualify for Medicaid. But on the first day of the big program, breathlessly promoted by media and politicians--nobody came to sign up. From the story:

Blame it on confusion over a federal judge's recent ruling. Blame it on a postholiday slump. Whatever the case, San Francisco's expansion on Wednesday of its landmark plan to provide health care to its 73,000 uninsured city residents had all the excitement of an annual physical.

The program, dubbed Healthy San Francisco, previously had been available only to uninsured city residents whose earnings didn't exceed the federal poverty level - about $10,200 a year. On Wednesday, it expanded to include those making up to about $32,000 a year, meaning roughly 47,000 people now qualify.

But few seemed to be taking advantage of it. At the program's new eligibility office near San Francisco General Hospital--designed for people to drop in or call to see if they qualify for the program--just one person had phoned by noon and all the chairs in the waiting room were empty. "Usually our chairs are all filled--it's unbelievable," said Vanda Baptista, who manages the eligibility office. "I was anticipating patients out the door."
Or maybe the intended beneficiaries are not as excited about receiving those services as the politicians and media are in providing them. Maybe health care isn't the huge 800 pound political gorilla some think it to be. We'll have to keep an eye on this, but if the program remains a benefit that nobody wants, it may have a more profound meaning than may at first meet the eye.

Labels:

5 Comments:

At January 03, 2008 , Blogger Mort Corey said...

Or....perhaps, if you only make $30K, and are living in San Francisco, you have more pressing concerns than lining up at some government office to swear on the Bible (oops, SF....that'd be the Communist Manifesto not the Bible) that you are actually entitled to said "benefit".

Such concern(s) would be having to go to work during the day to be able to pay the rent on your flop house room and (if lucky) have enough left over for your one square meal a day.

Mort

 
At January 03, 2008 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

Well, in defense of SF, you wouldn't have to live in a flop house if you made $30 K. You could have four roommates.

 
At January 03, 2008 , Blogger victor said...

If we had something like that in Canada, it would probably turn into Second Hand Smoke.

Stop picking on Canada cause you don't know what you're talking about! Me and my spouse plan to move there pretty soon. And what's wrong with same-sex-blessing may I ask?

WHO SAID THAT! (LOL!?)

 
At January 03, 2008 , Blogger Laura(southernxyl) said...

There is an unwarranted conflation of health care with health insurance.

Here is the abstract of an article about a study Prudential did in Memphis, TN to find out why women who had health insurance were not availing themselves of prenatal care.

Some people just do not make having health insurance or getting care a priority. I think the people who are very vocal about the crisis of health care in this country assume that everyone thinks as they do - that you have to have coverage and you have to get physicals and so forth. Well, you should, but some people just don't think so.

 
At January 04, 2008 , Blogger Mort Corey said...

"I think the people who are very vocal about the crisis of health care in this country assume that everyone thinks as they do - that you have to have coverage and you have to get physicals and so forth."

Exactly. People seemed to manage without "medical insurance" prior to the advent of Medicare. Normal expenses of giving birth, having a physical or setting a broken bone were not financially ruinous. The advent of the third party payer seemed to coincdie with rapidly escalating costs.

Interesting study. As one that has had medical insurance for decades, I think that my last actual full physical was given at no charge.....by the US Army at a pre-induction ceremony around 1967 or 68.

Mort

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home