Sunday, December 16, 2007

Something is Going Very Wrong in Healthcare

I am regularly contacted by families who believe their loved ones have been terribly mistreated in hospitals. Sometimes, it is clearly a misunderstanding and I try to set their minds at ease. At other times, the story seems to be an egregious abuse but there is little I can do. On those occasions, I try to give my correspondents ideas about how best to proceed toward obtaining redress or preventing similar abuses--or if that seems unlikely to bear fruit--on how to live with burning fire that one feels when they have seen a loved one victimized.

The following letter is typical of the kinds of letters I am talking about, and in fact, is less incendiary then most. It was written in response to this blog entry in which I recounted the case of a hospital that did not adequately communicate with a woman whose husband had been declared dead by neurological criteria.

I asked my correspondent for permission to post it here with all identifiers removed, and she graciously said yes, writing, "The article in the AJC hit so close to home. My heart breaks for families like this and angers me to no end when medical personnel treat family members and caregivers like they are ignorant and stupid. There is such a thing as "the patient bill of rights." Here is her note to me that deals with rudeness and the kind of pressure often put on patient families to dehydrate their cognitively disabled loved ones:


Dear Mr. Smith:
I took my husband, C---, who is in a coma to [X] hospital to have a test performed. He was transported by ambulance from our home however it was not an "emergency" situation. We were instructed prior to the test to route him through the E.R. for registration purposes so as not to clog up the waiting room and also expose him to others who might be have contagious illnesses. After being inside the hallway of the E.R. for about 5 minutes we literally had a physician and nurse push his gurney and tell us "he has to go...we can't have him in here..." The 2 paramedics almost came to fighting blows with the hospital staff because they were so rude and uncaring. A wonderful, loving and beautiful 42 year old man laying helpless on a gurney and all they want to do is clear up floor space. There was no major emergency going on at the time and believe me the waiting room was not full. Nurses and Physicians alike were goofing off and several exams rooms were empty. Not one person asked if they could help.

When C---- was in Intensive Care after his heart attack EVERY physician I came into contact with urged me to take out his feeding tube. Sometimes they would get me alone with 4 or 5 of them in a room at one time and I actually felt like I was being bullied. There was no other family but me to speak for him. I knew what his wishes were even though they weren't written down. I guess our lucky break was that we had health insurance. God provides all the miracles and He gave me one the day He gave C--- the breath of life again.

Hospital like X which is about 2 miles from my home need to teach their physicians how to behave like human beings and above all do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
I have no doubt she was being bullied. I hear from people on an ongoing basis who feel they were bullied. I have been in an ethics committee meeting representing an elderly woman pro bono who was being very badly treated by a doctor because she would not allow her husband with Alzheimer's to be dehydrated--this even though she had agreed to a DNR and no antibiotics. (We stopped the dehydration and changed doctors. He lived for three more years.) The room was hostile, everyone knew each other by first name, it had the feel of an inquisition. It was hard for me--and I am a lawyer. I don't know how she would have managed on her own.

Most doctors and nurses care very deeply about their patients and are committed medical professionals. Indeed, I believe that it is the workers in the trenches who are keeping medicine moral by resisting some of the utilitarian agendas being driven from the intelligentsia. But hospitals face resource shortages, which causes tempers to fray and can lead, indirectly, to viewing the most expensive to care for as unwanted ballast, which the utilitarian view fosters. This can lead to dehumanizing of the sickest patients and resentment of the families who love them and want to keep them alive. If this incipient conflict worsens, people will lose faith in medicine.

Labels:

9 Comments:

At December 16, 2007 , Blogger Aki_Izayoi said...

So this was with the NHS right? Or the United States?

But what about our right to life? Humans have a right to live as a long as they wish to. How come no one pays attention to this right?

 
At December 16, 2007 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

This was in the USA.

 
At December 16, 2007 , Blogger nurse said...

Unfortunately too often "caring" is
frequently missing in Health care today. If the life of a loved one is devalued by the treating professionals, their family by extension can also be devalued.

Increasingly I am seeing a hardened
attitude by medical professionals in their attitude in treating individuals who are not likely "to get better". They instead prefer to devote their efforts and energy caring for patients who will "get better and recover".

Those with long term, chronic conditions are often treated as though they are less than human.
The values of the professionals are imposed on the patient.

 
At December 16, 2007 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

nurse: Thanks very much for dropping by and sharing your concerns. I think that we are in the path of a perfect storm. Money is drying up and utilitarian ethics are devaluing the expensive to care for. It is going to be a bumpy ride.

 
At December 16, 2007 , Blogger Aki_Izayoi said...

I do not understand why you hate Aubrey de Grey... He said we have a right to life didn't he? I thought he wanted to cherish the value of human life, but you dismissed him when you were reviewing the transhumanism conference at Stanford.

Why did you dismiss him? Doesn't Aubrey de Grey have the perfect ethic to respond to the problem in health care?

 
At December 17, 2007 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

HKR: I don't hate him, but de Gray is not the subject of this post. We can discuss it if I write of him again or the next time I bring up transhumanism. Thanks.

 
At December 17, 2007 , Blogger Lois said...

WJS thank you for all you do. You'll never know how much encouragment I receive from reading your articles and blog. The support I receive helps me continue to fight the good fight for my Dad.
I've been battling the medical community for the last 9 years on behalf of my father, who has Alzheimer's and myriad other health problems. It is my opinion, based on our experiences that the elderly and disabled are completely unwanted as patients by healthcare professionals.

It has been suggested to me that I "turn his [Dad's] pacemaker/defibrillator off and let him go" by one D.O. (who is no longer his primary physician) - because my mother, his wife "was dead, he is demented and can no longer go grocery shopping with you"....I kid you not! These were the reasons stated.
If not going grocery shopping is a reason for active euthanasia, then I should be killed at my advanced age of 51, because I hate to shop...but I digress!

Now that my father is in a nursing home I've been told by the attending doctor that there is "no way we will ever put in a feeding tube, SO DON'T EVEN ASK FOR ONE".
He can still eat on his own, thankfully, but I refused to sign a form saying that I didn't want a feeding tube for him.
Apparently his "DNR" isn't enough to satisfy their lust for his death. They want to keep all their options open, and shut off all of his to live out his life according to his Maker.
It's disgusting. But, we keep on fighting and advocating because to do anything less would be fatal...
Thank you.
Lois

 
At December 17, 2007 , Blogger Laura(southernxyl) said...

That whole feeding tube phobia drives me nuts.

My mother-in-law has required a feeding tube twice in the last few years while recovering from two serious illnesses. In each case, she got over the illness and the tube came out. It shouldn't be too much to ask that medical people differentiate between feeding tubes that allow people to recover from temporary illnesses and feeding tubes that become necessary when the patient can no longer eat due to end-stage Alzheimer's - although I'd never say that the Alzheimer's patient should starve either.

 
At December 17, 2007 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

Lois: I am humbled. You are the one fighting for the life of your father. It isn't easy to stand fast against pressure.

I agree with you Laura. Feeding tubes used to be considered a relatively minor matter to help patients unable to swallow or who might aspirate their food. Now, it is seen as the epitome of indignity and its withdrawing or withholding a splendid way to get rid of "biologically tenacious" patients, as one bioethicist once described the debate subjects.

I don't think that patients expected to recover are in danger. But patients not expected to recover are increasingly being seen as "the other," whose time has come to go, as if recovery were the only purpose of medicine.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home