Watson Out at Cold Spring Harbor
Cold Spring Harbor, the very name should bring chills. It was the home of the notorious Eugenics Record Office, operated for decades in the early 20th Century by the world's most influential eugenicist Charles Davenport--one of the great villains in American history--through whose work involuntary sterilization, anti-miscegenation laws, and other bigotry policies were justified. His assistant and eventual successor, Harry Laughlin, justified anti-Semitism as part of his work in eugenics and was awarded by the Nazis for his work in promoting racial hygiene.
CSH went out of the eugenics business and continues today as a research center into the science of genetics and other strictly medical pursuits. But its close association with James Watson--and appointing him as its head of the research center--has always seemed to me a disturbing echo of those odious days of old, as Watson often publicly promoted the values of eugenics, promoted eugenic enhancements, justified anti-Semitism, and otherwise spoke in ways that Davenport would clearly have approved.
Until now, none of this mattered, and most in the science community merely chuckled about Watson's ravings as if he were the brusque uncle home for Thanksgiving dinner who spoke aloud what others just thought. But now, with the cultural Left--which cared nothing about his denigration of the disabled--up in arms about his racist remarks, Davenport is out at Cold Spring Harbor. From the story:James Watson, the co-discoverer of the structure of DNA, has made many controversial remarks over the years. But telling a British newspaper that, in effect, blacks are intellectually inferior to whites seems to have landed him in unprecedented trouble. Last evening, as public criticism of those remarks swelled to a crescendo, the Board of Trustees of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) in Long Island, New York, stripped Watson of his title as chancellor of the 117-year-old institution...
The [Watson's] apology may fail to quell the controversy. "While we honor the extraordinary contributions that Dr. Watson has made to science in the past, his comments show that he has lost his way," Henry Kelly, president of the Federation of American Scientists, said yesterday in a statement. "He has failed us in the worst possible way. It is a sad and revolting way to end a remarkable career."
The lesson here is that there are some odious things you can say--promote explicitly eugenic thinking--and some things you can't say, e.g. racist comments. Watson should have been long gone way before this. The media should follow up on this, illustrate his other demeaning comments, and pose the question to Cold Spring Harbor and his buddies among "the scientists," What took you so long?"
Labels: Watson. Cold Spring Harbor


7 Comments:
There are a few things that you are not allowed to discuss, even if it is backed up by empirical evidence.
This topic, however, makes me very depressed, and I try to forget about it. Maybe SSRIs would work?
By if you are interested in the empirical evidence:
http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushton_pubs.htm
and Linda Gottfredson's page.
Of course, I do not recommend going to those pages. I will reiterate: simply do not talk about it unless you want to be mired in despondency.
I believe transhumanism will provide a healthy solution to this and other problems. James Hughes believes in this too. Of course, if Hughes does believe in the genetic differences, he did a laudable job in dealing with it in Citizen Cyborg; he didn't talk about it.
The solution to such concerns is to dismiss them as of no consequence or relevancy. People are people, all equal in terms of moral value. Capacities don't matter in this regard.
I also believe that people are of equal moral value. As a negative utilitarian, I think rights are derived from the capacity to suffer. Thus, a person with Down syndrome has the same right to life as a Nobel Prize winner; they both have the same capacity to suffer. It is somewhat similar to Hughes' four tier system.
Talking about racial differences in intelligence doesn't solve anything; it just foments more hatred. It also reminds us about our futility to change the human condition.
You can guess how I choose to deal with that unpleasantness; look at my pseudonym. Watching that Japanese shows distracts me for this imbroglio.
HKR: Escapism isn't the answer, nor is despair. Perhaps the purpose of life is to commit ourselves to each other. If you don't already, might I humbly suggest you volunteer to help the vulnerable. Human nature is certainly flawed, but we do have better angels of our natures (to borrow from Lincoln). Volunteering adds to the positive in the world, which could help lighten your psychic load.
Anime as therapy?
I'm a fanficcer myself, HKR, but dang, nothing is so down that everything is reduced to hiding in your room and watching anime instead of doing something about it.
I think you should change the anime you're watching. Try Full Metal Alchemist.
"One is all. All is one." If you figure that out then maybe you can get past your despondency.
Greg Ford asked me to post this for him:
"The question as to whether Ashley is "'disabled'" seems a red herring, distracting from the question as to whether she is a person. It would seem that Tarzian feels (I do not mean *thinks*) that those to whom we would deny membership in the latter category must, by definition, be denied membership in the former. Her purport, of course, is to negate the validity of any objections to Ashley's mistreatment: if there's no person, she can't be "'disabled,'" and she can't mistreated or taken advantage of or anything -- because "she" doesn't, in some fundamental way, exist. Narrative wins out over substance, and the helpless disappear into spurious logic yet again."
http://youtube.com/watch?v=6MrTDSOtqgs (Play from 4:20-5:30)
That guy really reminds me of James Hughes' transhumanism, and I died 2 episodes earlier:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=zSM-vJMo1hc
Shouldn't have taken torcetrapib, I guess. (Of course, I did not take it, but it was pulled from clinical trials because of increased incidents of cardiovascular disease)
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home