Sunday, July 15, 2007

UK Moving Toward "Presumed Consent" to Organ "Donation?"

So much for "donating" organs. Britain's most senior doctor will recommend that when a person dies, that his organs be taken--unless he or she previously opted out--barring concerted objections from family.

Known as "soft presumed consent," such a plan could be disastrous and destroy the confidence people have in medicine--particularly in the UK in which the NHS is imploding and health care rationing is already encroaching on Hippocratic medical values. Here's why: If every patient were deemed by law a probably organ donor, the temptation--particularly given the increased influence of utilitarian bioethics--would be to view the sickest patients as so many organ systems whose primary worth would be to help other people. The fear among the people would be that the critically ill--particularly otherwise "healthy" people with significant cognitive impairments--would be treated (or non treated) in a way to benefit potential organ recipients rather than the patient him/herself. Paranoia would strike a beat/Into your life it would seep...

Labels:

1 Comments:

At May 27, 2008 , Blogger The Preacher said...

More than half the people in the US and more than 40% in the UK, registered in the National Organ Donor registry, dont end up as donors because one doesnt not get consent from their respective families/relatives. Where's the justice in that? Double standards?

Only about 8% of the German population who has expressed willingness to donate carry an Organ Donor card. That figure in the UK is about 18%. There is a huge dearth of organs for transplant whilst at the same time so many potential ones being wasted. Why should those requiring an organ pay for the public's complacency?

We all need a little shock to jolt the process of change, which is very much needed. If the jolt comes from a legislative change, so be it.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home