Friday, July 27, 2007

"Medical Marijuana" Political Follies


The House of Representatives has voted down an amendment that would have prohibited the DEA from enforcing federal drug laws against medical marijuana participants in states where cannabis as medicine is legal. And the bill only got two more votes than the last time the House considered it before the recent Democratic takeover. What a dumb approach, so typical of our gutless politicians!

The reason why marijuana can't be used as medicine under federal law is simple: The Controlled Substances Act states explicitly that marijuana has no medical uses. That is the law. It is wrong. And it chills efforts to study marijuana's potential medicinal uses--which definitely need to be studied.

So instead, we have the surrealistic state systems in which doctors write letters instead of prescriptions, and patients go to "pot clubs" instead of pharmacies to obtain their "medicine." This kind of chaotic distribution leads to crime, people getting pot for "stress," and etc. And it breeds disrespect for crucial distinctions between using drugs for medicinal and recreational purposes.

What needs to be done is change the federal law, conduct studies to determine what conditions for which marijuana has and does not have medicinal benefits, and allow formal prescriptions for cannabis distributed through pharmacies to treat those afflictions against which cannabis has a medicinal benefit. And not permit prescriptions for ailments in which it doesn't.

Unfortunately, the government doesn't have that kind of wisdom. And some supporters of medical marijuana aren't interested in that approach either, apparently, because their cause too often seems to be about legalizing pot, not helping people who are sick.

This leads to the nonsense we have now of at least three different approaches toward medical marijuana in the country: The federal government's strict prohibition, most states' strict prohibition, and some states' permissiveness with few effective regulatory controls. This ridiculousness has to change--and that starts with removing marijuana from the category of no medical benefits in the Controlled Substances Act--which should be done as a matter of integrity, in any event, because it clearly isn't true.

Labels:

5 Comments:

At July 27, 2007 , Blogger Steve said...

Are you suggesting that marijuana's medical benefits can only be met by smoking it?

If there are things for which marijuana has some medicinal use, wouldn't it be wiser to extract or manufacture whatever chemicals are responsible and use an alternative delivery method?

 
At July 27, 2007 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

Steve: There already is and it is called Marinol. But everyone who ever took it that I know says it doesn't work well.

I think that if morphine--which is a true narcotic--can be a medicine, as it should be, so too should MJ. But we have to find what it is good for, if anything, and what it is not. That takes specific testing, which is chilled by the current state of the law. Thanks for writing.

 
At July 27, 2007 , Blogger Royale said...

Oh my goodness, wow. Wesley and I agree wholeheartedly on something. I almost jumped out my seat applauding this post.

 
At July 27, 2007 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Our country's current paranoia over anything that has the word "drug" in it is getting ridiculous. Kids are getting suspended from school for having Advil or Tylenol. They even have a "Drug Information" label on DEODORANT for crying out loud! This attitude is having a horrible effect on our ability to treat people with severe or chronic pain. All in all, a huge mess.

Aside to Steve: Brownies make an excellent alternative delivery method AND they're much cheaper than Marinol.

 
At August 06, 2007 , Blogger Unknown said...

I work for an organization, MAPS, that recently won a landmark lawsuit against the DEA regarding medical marijuana. With one more step in the approval process, we are urging the DEA to accept the recommendation by their own Administrative Law Judge to grant a license to grow marijuana for FDA trials to determine whether or not it has medicinal value. In an effort to put pressure on the DEA, Reps. John Olver (D-MA) and Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) are co-sponsoring a Congressional Sign-On Letter urging the DEA to accept the Recommended Ruling.

This legal struggle has taken years. If the DEA rules against granting the license, there’s no telling how many more years will go by before marijuana is evaluated in FDA trials. For decades, the federal government has excluded marijuana from highly-demanded drug development research. Now is a unique window of opportunity to change this!

To learn more about MAPS, please visit our web site at http://www.maps.org -- For background on the case and to contact your Representative, see MAPS' DEA Lawsuit page http://www.maps.org/mmj/DEAlawsuit.html or supportive editorials from The Economist http://www.maps.org/sys/nq.pl?id=1314&fmt=page and LA Times http://www.maps.org/sys/nq.pl?id=1341&fmt=page.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home