Blank Check Ethics: Here Come the "Manimals"

Get ready for the "manimals." In Sunday's Washington Post, Will Saletan describes how some scientists have cut themselves loose from the tether of self restraint and are busily planning the creation of human/animal chimeras with increasingly human attributes. From his column:
So far, our [human/animal] mixtures are modest. To make humanized animals really creepy, you'd have to do several things. You'd increase the ratio of human to animal DNA. You'd transplant human cells that spread throughout the body. You'd do it early in embryonic development, so the human cells would shape the animals' architecture, not just blend in. You'd grow the embryos to maturity. And you'd start messing with the brain.Of course we are. Too many of "the scientists" have decided that curiosity, the laudable desire to achieve increasingly miraculous scientific and medical advances, and/or the drive to gain fame and fortune with the newest biotechnological breakthrough justifies their doing whatever they decide is necessary to achieve their desired ends. And so, they zoom along, heedless of the ethical objections that society might haveWe're doing all of these things.
to their biological manipulations, bitterly denigrating anyone who might express doubts as "anti-science."This intimidates some people, but not everyone. Reading Saletan's piece brought to mind one of my favorite essays on the subject, written for the Weekly Standard several years ago by my good friend Joseph Bottum (now the editor of First Things) in reaction to a probably false news story that "the scientists" had created a human/pig embryo through cloning. "The Pig Man Cometh" is a wonderful, if hyperbolic, expression of wholly justified righteous rage by one of our best thinkers and writers. Here's a sampling:
You can't say we weren't warned. This is the island of Dr. Moreau. This is thebrave new world. This is Dr. Frankenstein's chamber. This is Dr. Jekyll's room. This is Satan's Pandemonium, the city of self-destruction the rebel angels wrought in their all-consuming pride...We have reached the logical end, at last. We have become the people that, once upon a time, our ancestors used fairy tales to warn their children against-and we will reap exactly the consequences those tales foretold.
Like the coming true of an old story-the discovery of the philosopher's stone, the rubbing of a magic lantern-biotechnology is
delivering the most astonishing medical advances anyone has ever imagined. You and I will live for many years in youthful health: Our cancers, our senilities, our coughs, and our infirmities all swept away on the triumphant, cresting wave of science.
But our sons and daughters will mate with the pig-men, if the pig-men will have them. And our swine-snouted grandchildren-the fruit not of our loins, but of our arrogance and our bright test tubes-will use the story of our generation to teach a moral to their frightened litters.
Saletan doesn't think any of this can be stopped. He concludes:
If you want permanent restrictions, your best bet is the senator who tried to impose them two years ago. He's the same presidential candidate now leading the charge against evolution: Sam Brownback, a Kansas Republican. He thinks we're separate from other animals, "unique in the created order." Too bad this wasn't true in the past -- and won't be true in the future.I'm not so pessimistic. It isn't just Senator Brownback who opposes these agendas. Even most scientists don't want to take things as far as Bottum's metaphorical "swine-snouted grandchildren." And a big push back is coming. At some point either common sense will prevail and scientific freedom will be exercised responsibly or society will finally say, "Enough!" and apply the appropriate corrective. If that leads to the over regulation of science, the anything goes crowd will only have themselves to blame.
Labels: Anything Goes Science.




8 Comments:
Nothing more than Dr. Moreau's aprentices! It's gotta be the most pathetic scientific experiments ever... :) H. G. Wells is turning in his grave......
Wesley,
About 10 years ago, I remember reading about a mouse that was genetically-engineered to have a human immune system. Scientists wanted to use the mouse to study immuno-disorders and diseases.
Do you think the creation of this mouse crosses the ethical line? If not, then where should the line be?
No. In fact, in CONSUMER'S GUIDE, I supported pharming and stated clearly that transgenic animals are not objectionable. But when you begin to move into areas that will change animal behavior and animals that are substantially human, as described by Saletan, then lines are being crossed. At the very least, some of this more intricate research should wait until we can create the proper boundaries, don't you think? Or, is science the end and there should be no boundaries other than those scientists self impose?
"Or, is science the end and there should be no boundaries other than those scientists self impose?"
Your point is well taken, but it's been like that for 1000s of years. Repeatedly, science made an advancement and it took a long time for society to develop rules to regulate it (i.e., industrialization, nuclear age, internet).
That's not a defense, just a realization.
re: "substantially human"
A science fiction writer could have a lot of fun with that. But preferably not Michael Crichton.
Well, there wasn't any real attempt to regulate science in the areas of human research until the Nuremberg Code.
The point is, these matters are moving very fast and the implications are very important. I have posted stories in which science societies couldn't even get consensus on voluntary limitations. In the end, I worry that such hubris will cause over regulation.
Stories like this demonstrate the gulf between knowledge and wisdom.
ethic, ethics: the poetry of hipocracy! Riddled with fear and superstition. Blinded with human supremecy, we slaughter millions of animals in sanctified canibalism. What would we learn when the chimera's speak back. Perhaps, that we have always been the gods of our own construction, and when this is denighed, all suffer. Pragmatism will save the day, those who wish to mate with manimals will do so, just look at the fury phenomina in secondlife, when given the opertunity, we will. I'd rather have a pig save my life than not. And if that pig attained a phd, then it would be through skill, not forced donation. Humans would benifit, the pig would have a better job, and we all would learn to enjoy vegatables, until the carrot says, dont eat me. Those who wish to cause suffering, through human and animal experiments or carless experimentation, should be eat'n insted. The goals are to enhance life, not just humans lives, but all life: including an animals. I would assist nature in a second, nature has invited us to participate, because we are nature: dirt and animal, beauty and pride, arrogence and humor. What animal lacks these things. Oh yes, selfishness, there's a big one. 'These are our god given genes, and no animal should share' or 'trans-genetics to the back of the bus', 'no daughter of mine is marry'n no furry'. I'm checking my dogs blog, to read her opinion. She thinks most humans like their food dumb and want to keep it way, and it has nothing to do with ethics, but a deep root of blinding superiority.
David: Animals eat other animals as well...
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home