Friday, December 15, 2006

Biotech/Bioethics Potpourri

Here are few stories I saw today that are worth noticing.

1. Canadian scientists have cured mice with Type 1 diabetes using a substance that counteracted malfunctioning pain neurons in the pancreas. This is the second experiment in recent years that cured mice with juvenile diabetes, and both are ready for human trials. The first experiment, by Denise Faustman at Harvard, used a similar substance and adult stem cells. Perhaps that is why she is having a tough time getting the money for human trials. The Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) has, so far, has refused to fund it, even though it put $1 million into the passage of Proposition 71, which creates a state right to clone in California. This second experiment also has nothing to do with embryonic stem cell research, so we will see how much support its researchers receive. Also, Canada bans all human cloning, yet lo and behold, there is good biotechnological research going on.

2. Cloned cat has kittens: The first cloned cat has had naturally conceived kittens. So did Dolly and have other cloned animals. The point is that SCNT is a form of mammalian reproduction--asexual reproduction--in which the cloned mammal begins life, just as in sexual reproduction, as a one cell zygote. This is true of humans too, even though the junk biology purveying political-scientists pretend that it doesn't.

3. The UN has agreed to a treaty to protect the disabled: Among its provisions, is Article 25 (f) that is intended to "prevent discriminatory denial of health care or health services or food and fluids on the basis of disability." Hmmm. Sounds like a shot across the bow against Futile Care Theory, and seems a lot like the Nebraska Humane Care Amendment. I am going to look into this further and perhaps write about its provisions and import at some length.

This much is sure: The issues we deal with here at Secondhand Smoke are going to continually grow in importance and controversy in the coming year.

3 Comments:

At December 15, 2006 , Blogger T E Fine said...

1) That the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation would deny ANY kind of research that might prolong the life of or give comfort to any person born with diabetes is sick. Anyone who dies from Type I diabetes who might have been saved by these wonderful advances should be treated as a murder victim, and the JDRF should be treated as an accessory to murder.

2) I can't say I'm too happy about this story, though I understand why you posted it. Yes, SCNT is reproduction. Scientists need to watch that cat and her kindle very closely, and realize that any screw-ups in those cats are the result of human tampering. Then they need to get it through their heads that not only are cloned embryos babies, but that these are babies who are stuck suffering anything we adults did to them in the name of science.

3) Well, I guess something good will come out of the UN, but here's the deal - how much do you want to bet that the US won't honor this treaty? It's too inconvinent.

 
At December 15, 2006 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

We could discuss the UN, but that is beyond our scope. But the existence of this treaty, assuming that enough countries sign it, gives a lie to those who say only religious fanatics worry about dehdrating the cognitively disabled.

 
At December 16, 2006 , Blogger T E Fine said...

Ah, point taken.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home