Politicized Science Undermining Adult Stem Cell Research?
This is the second story I have seen in the last two weeks along these lines. Apparently, the political-scientists' intentional blurring of "stem cell research" with "embryonic stem cell research," is chilling the way forward in areas that are not ethically contentious. If these advocates were truly "pro science" they would pointedly avoid such confusion not intentionally sow it, and then such problems would not arise.
Stories like this reinforce my view that many ESCR/SCNT advocates are not "pro science," but rather, seek to alter fundamental cultural values. In other words, they are ideological advocates and the embryonic stem cell/cloning issue is about more than a simple dispute about the extent and terms of federal funding.
HT: Rebecca Taylor (again)
posted by Wesley J. Smith @ 9:35 AM
2 Comments
2 Comments:
Mr. Smith’s argument is not biological but behavioral. Human exceptionalism is obvious. Those who disagree must work at rationalizing away the obvious. What animals have invented machines? Where do we find animal statues? Which species of animal make the best clothes? Any animal suicide bombers? Is Koko a Libertarian?
Robert B “interprets” the argument to save sea lions as a result of self preservation or conditioning. He seems unaware of the simple fact that the preservation of the sea lion is an argument. There are those who have not been conditioned (despite living in the same country and attending the same schools) who argue against efforts to protect the sea lion. Of course, their argument is that “self preservation” and protection of resources (fish) against competition.
Our strong sense of self interest gives us both abortion and neonatal intensive care units. Self interest explains everything and nothing.
I think the above comment is about the human exceptionalism issue, since it is already posted there.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home