Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Once Again Missouri Media Totally Ignorant About SCNT

The only question I have about the Missouri media is whether they are intentionally ignorant about the scientific facts of human cloning, or they just don't care.

The latest example of such journalistic malpractice comes in a St. Louis Post Dispatch column by Sylvester Brown, Jr.. Brown writes about a political candidate named Cynthia Kramer, who is supporting Amendment 2--an initiative to create a state constitutional right to conduct human cloning research in MO--as having had her leukemia put into remission, by stem cells, he writes, created through SCNT. He writes: "When Kramer's cancer went into remission in 2002, she had her healthy cells harvested through a process called somatic cell nuclear transfer. After doctors transplanted those cells, the cancer again went into remission."

I don't know whether to laugh or cry at such a bold assertion of an utter falsehood. Scientists have never harvested embryonic stem cells from cloned embryos to date, and certainly hadn't done so in 2002. In fact, the procedure he describes is a classic adult stem cell procedure using bone marrow, a method often used with great success in treating leukemia. Good grief, where were this man's editors?

I ask again: Can't the media ever get this story factually right? Shame on Mr. Brown and his editors for foisting such misinformation upon the MO electorate during a heated and crucial campaign.

2 Comments:

At September 13, 2006 , Blogger CS said...

They're worthless, but very dangerous as they have people's ears.

Look at all the crappy 'reporting' (regurgitated Mike propaganda) that pushed along the Schiavo case.

 
At September 18, 2006 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

To Brown's credit, he has admitted his mistake. The St. Louis Post Dispatch ran several letters (including mine) that also corrected the mistake. A (lousy) formal correction was issued also. Brown says he will write more about Amendment 2 and stem cell research. He is entitled to his opinion, but if it is based on junk science, I will discuss it here.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home