Saturday, January 07, 2006

Pew Poll "Right to Die" Terminology Misleading

The Pew Poll, which I reported on below, also finds huge majorities favoring the so-called "right to die." This is an ambiguous term, often used by assisted suicide advocates to identify their cause. But this section of the poll is not referring to euthanasia or assisted suicide. Rather, it measures the belief that people have the right to refuse or stop unwanted medical treatment. That is a completely different moral issue from killing as a response to the difficulties associated with illness or disability.

The poll finds an unsurprising 84-10 in support of permitting death to come from natural causes by withdrawing life-sustaining treatment or other measures. Count me among the majority. As a former hospice volunteer, whose father died while under hospice care, I understand completely the importance of having the right not to have a respirator, chemotherapy, surgery, or even antibiotics. In the old parlance, people should not be hooked up to machines against their will.

However, I believe that feeding tubes should be analyzed differently. I believe cutting off feeding tubes from people based on quality of life judgments or cognitive impairment alone is immoral.

But I am not the dictator. It seem clear that people want the right to be dehydrated by removal or withholding of tube-supplied nutrition and hydration if they become profoundly cognitively disabled. And indeed, that is the law in all fifty states.

That being noted, it does seem to me that given the fact that depriving people of water and nutrition can only have one outcome, and given the profound symbolism inherent in refusing to provide such basic care, the responsibility for refusing feeding tubes should be on the patient and should have to put in writing. Absent that, the strong presumption of the law should be to provide such sustenance in all medically appropriate cases. Otherwise, we risk resurrecting the notion of the life unworthy of life wherein people are taken out to put them out of our misery.

1 Comments:

At January 16, 2006 , Blogger Nancy Reyes said...

Sorry, Eddiep, Kavorkian killed depressed women who weren't dying, a delusional schizophrenic man, and an abused wife suffering merely from "fibromyalgia" (she even was encouraged by her loving psychiatrist/abuser husband)...
The dirty little secret is that the "easy death" actually means premature dying, and a culture where "useless" people are pressured to die, or if they are incompetent, killed by "angels of death"...
As for Schiavo: If she couldn't swallow food and water, she couldn't swallow saliva, and would have died of aspiration pneumonia...the estimated "life span" of such people is two years...her death was for the convenience of her husband...who, if her parents hadn't fought him in court, would have inherited all that malpractice money...
Yes I have had patients who refused feeding tubes...they are optional in terminally ill people, including those with Alzheimer's disease...but too often they are placed for the convenience of the nursing homes and family...

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home