Monday, December 26, 2005

Ian Wilmut Wants to Experiment With Stem Cells on the Dying

Ian Wilmut, the creator of Dolly and now a would-be cloner of human embryos wants to experiment on dying people. Rather than go through the usual process of animal studies to test efficacy and safety, he wants to switch quickly to conducting embryonic stem cell experiments upon dying people on the basis that the experiments would be "high risk but high gain" procedures.

This has a certain surface attraction. After all, if people are dying, what's the harm? Well the harm could be substantial. First, unlike some experimental cancer treatments carried out on those dying of late stage disease to see if they can gain extra time, embryonic stem cells have not proven themselves to be "high gain" in animal studies yet. Therefore, it cannot be said whether or to what extent they would offer any real hope at all to the patient.

Second, it is quite possible if things go wrong, that they could increase the patient's suffering, perhaps causing brain cancer as one example mentioned in the story.

Third, we could fall headlong into the trap of looking upon our dying as so many guinea pigs, furthering the dehumanization that seems to go hand-in-hand with therapeutic cloning and ESCR research. Moreover, such a scheme would seem to violate agreed upon protocols for human medical experimentation.

Fourth, if the dying will not be with us for long enough to really test the procedures, who would be next on Wilmut's list? Those in persistent vegetative states? How about quadriplegics who would rather risk a brain tumor than live paralyzed? Once we begin down that road, we enter very dangerous territory.

Dying people are not dead: They are living. And they should be treated as fully equal and included members of the community. Using them in place of lab rats and potentially causing them great harm does quite the opposite, unless there is at least some realistic potential for therapeutic gain.

7 Comments:

At December 27, 2005 , Blogger Mary Alice Phillips said...

I agree that this has real slippery slope potential. And I find it creepy that Ian Wilmut is the director of the Center for Regenerative Medicine. Just think about that!

 
At December 27, 2005 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

Animal studies are definitely necessary in medical research. I have written some on this, articles available in my articles archives. Also in my book CULTURE OF DEATH.

As just one relevant example, we know that embryonic stem cells cause tumors, making them unsafe at present for human use. Why? Because we injected them into animals--mice mostly--and found out. That kind of information could not have found using cell lines or in computer models. It required the use of living body systems. That meant, it had to either be animals or humans.

Thanks for your continuing interest and contributions to Secondhand Smoke.

 
At December 28, 2005 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At December 28, 2005 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

I don't think that human research should be expanded in order to use fewer animals, but I do believe we can continually look for ways to use fewer animals. That is a worthy issue, involving animal welfare views, as opposed to animal rights/liberation, that I support.

I reject the idea that people don't want to improve animal welfare approaches because we don't want to give up power. That concept falls into Ingrid Newkirk's idea of "supremicists," which is, frankly, baloney. Thanks again.

 
At December 29, 2005 , Blogger Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D. said...

Dying people deserve the opportunity to live the remainder of their lives to the fullest possible. How can they do that as the subject of experiments?

This guy is a materialist creep. It seems that, to him, the human body is just a machine to tinker with.

May God forgive him.

 
At December 30, 2005 , Blogger Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D. said...

ccepdx,

I wasn't talking about you. I was talking about Ian Wilmut. Sorry that I obviously wasn't clear about that.

 
At January 01, 2006 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

I don't lump them all together. But it is also incumbent upon animal activists to enegetically distinguish themselves from the violent whackos. After all, it is their cause that is being harmed.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home