Friday, June 24, 2005

And Yet More Animal Liberation Terrorism

UK animal liberationists have commenced an arson campaign against companies that do business with Huntingdon Life Sciences. If the company is driven out of business by this tactic, not even McDonald's will be safe. And the silence from the "peaceful" animal rights believers is deafening.

4 Comments:

At June 25, 2005 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

You imply you oppose the violence. Thank you. I have repeatedly asked my correspondents who believe in animal liberation to do so, and you are the first.

There are, of course, some liberationists who do not support violence. Gary Francione, whom I have debated, is another. But stating so in subdued ways is utterly inadequate to the task. PETA is a huge culprit in this regard by explicitly REFUSING to condemn such tactics. And PETA, in many ways, is the public face of animal liberation.

If the animal libertion movement is not to be completely taken over by the whackos, those who oppose these tactics are going to have to become very organized and vocal, and yes, issue angry press releases after every illegal act. It's time to take back your movement before it is too late.

Thanks for writing.

 
At June 25, 2005 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

Agreed.

I am not involved in the abortion issue but unequivocally condemn any threats or violence in that or any other area of cultural contention.

 
At June 25, 2005 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

I have written about this beyond on my blog and plan a book on it, which will include the very discussion you propose. I support animal welfare and its advocacy. I oppose animal rights vehemently, for reasons I have written about extensively.

The violence issue though is crucial. As I see it, the more radical liberationists are growing increasingly bold and nasty. Unless they are reined in, and hard, by other animal rights advocates, somebody is going to be seriously hurt or killed.

The only people who they might listen to are other animal liberationists. The only people who may know who they are so that law enforcement can be alerted, are other animal liberationists. But PETA winks at them, refusing to condemn, raising the suspicion that its leadership doesn't oppose the violence even though they might not participate personally. That's disgraceful. Well meaning folk like yourself need to fill in the breach.

 
At June 25, 2005 , Blogger Wesley J. Smith said...

You'll get no argument from me on that score, pal.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home